Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:3267

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 19:47, 11 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr1:42756486..42756497,+p@chr1:42756486..42756497
+
Mm9::chr1:42756507..42756526,+p@chr1:42756507..42756526
+
Mm9::chr1:42758010..42758014,+p@chr1:42758010..42758014
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
central nervous system1.09e-3173
nervous system2.47e-3075
regional part of nervous system3.28e-2854
gray matter8.49e-2734
neural tube3.65e-2652
neural rod3.65e-2652
future spinal cord3.65e-2652
neural keel3.65e-2652
brain grey matter1.28e-2429
regional part of telencephalon1.28e-2429
telencephalon1.28e-2429
ectoderm-derived structure6.31e-2495
ectoderm6.31e-2495
presumptive ectoderm6.31e-2495
neurectoderm6.45e-2464
neural plate6.45e-2464
presumptive neural plate6.45e-2464
brain1.39e-2347
future brain1.39e-2347
regional part of brain8.16e-2346
ecto-epithelium5.83e-2273
anterior neural tube8.78e-2240
regional part of forebrain4.70e-2139
forebrain4.70e-2139
future forebrain4.70e-2139
cerebral cortex6.21e-2021
cerebral hemisphere6.21e-2021
pallium6.21e-2021
pre-chordal neural plate1.67e-1849
regional part of cerebral cortex7.89e-1617
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest3.94e-1492
occipital lobe4.71e-1010
visual cortex4.71e-1010
neocortex4.71e-1010
cavitated compound organ5.71e-1021
kidney7.37e-0814
kidney mesenchyme7.37e-0814
upper urinary tract7.37e-0814
kidney rudiment7.37e-0814
kidney field7.37e-0814
Ammon's horn3.34e-077
lobe parts of cerebral cortex3.34e-077
hippocampal formation3.34e-077
limbic system3.34e-077
limbic lobe3.34e-077


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}