Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1997

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 13:00, 5 September 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1997_Chondrocyte_vagina_aorta_mesodermal_heart_Fibroblast_tenocyte



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr7:44143738..44143760,+p4@AEBP1
Hg19::chr7:44143925..44143970,+p1@AEBP1
Hg19::chr7:44143978..44143989,+p2@AEBP1
Hg19::chr7:44143997..44144008,+p3@AEBP1
Hg19::chr7:44146212..44146234,+p@chr7:44146212..44146234
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
adult organism1.14e-15115
organism subdivision3.83e-14365
somite8.99e-1383
paraxial mesoderm8.99e-1383
presomitic mesoderm8.99e-1383
presumptive segmental plate8.99e-1383
trunk paraxial mesoderm8.99e-1383
presumptive paraxial mesoderm8.99e-1383
cell layer1.26e-10312
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm1.78e-1084
dermomyotome2.54e-1070
epithelium3.46e-10309
anatomical cluster3.70e-10286
circulatory system2.12e-09113
cardiovascular system4.64e-09110
vasculature5.00e-0979
vascular system5.00e-0979
muscle tissue7.78e-0963
musculature7.78e-0963
musculature of body7.78e-0963
multilaminar epithelium9.55e-0982
anatomical conduit1.22e-08241
tube1.37e-08194
trunk mesenchyme1.88e-08143
skeletal muscle tissue2.30e-0861
striated muscle tissue2.30e-0861
myotome2.30e-0861
multi-tissue structure2.35e-08347
integument9.58e-0845
integumental system9.58e-0845
blood vessel1.34e-0760
epithelial tube open at both ends1.34e-0760
blood vasculature1.34e-0760
vascular cord1.34e-0760
primary circulatory organ1.46e-0727
surface structure1.59e-0795
neural plate1.89e-0786
presumptive neural plate1.89e-0786
compound organ2.13e-0769
heart2.53e-0724
primitive heart tube2.53e-0724
primary heart field2.53e-0724
anterior lateral plate mesoderm2.53e-0724
heart tube2.53e-0724
heart primordium2.53e-0724
cardiac mesoderm2.53e-0724
cardiogenic plate2.53e-0724
heart rudiment2.53e-0724
neurectoderm3.66e-0790
vessel7.89e-0769
skin of body8.48e-0740


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
EGR1#195843.990543275848110.0067800983001440.0287766361754273



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.