Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4811

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:53, 21 May 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4811_Fibroblast_extraskeletal_leiomyoma_Smooth_giant_mesenchymal_Synoviocyte



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr9:18474125..18474160,+p1@ADAMTSL1
Hg19::chr9:18474163..18474202,+p2@ADAMTSL1
Hg19::chr9:18474204..18474215,+p3@ADAMTSL1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
somite2.40e-2683
paraxial mesoderm2.40e-2683
presomitic mesoderm2.40e-2683
presumptive segmental plate2.40e-2683
trunk paraxial mesoderm2.40e-2683
presumptive paraxial mesoderm2.40e-2683
dermomyotome2.50e-2370
vasculature3.20e-2379
vascular system3.20e-2379
vessel3.72e-2069
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm5.19e-2084
multilaminar epithelium9.12e-2082
skeletal muscle tissue2.35e-1961
striated muscle tissue2.35e-1961
myotome2.35e-1961
muscle tissue2.77e-1963
musculature2.77e-1963
musculature of body2.77e-1963
blood vessel1.95e-1860
epithelial tube open at both ends1.95e-1860
blood vasculature1.95e-1860
vascular cord1.95e-1860
cardiovascular system9.38e-17110
trunk mesenchyme2.03e-16143
circulatory system2.20e-16113
artery4.28e-1542
arterial blood vessel4.28e-1542
arterial system4.28e-1542
organism subdivision9.20e-15365
epithelial tube1.22e-13118
unilaminar epithelium3.35e-13138
multi-cellular organism9.99e-13659
cell layer1.19e-12312
systemic artery1.58e-1233
systemic arterial system1.58e-1233
epithelium3.00e-12309
integument9.60e-1245
integumental system9.60e-1245
surface structure4.69e-1195
skin of body2.62e-1040
anatomical system5.85e-10625
trunk7.34e-10216
multi-tissue structure8.97e-10347
anatomical group9.09e-10626
anatomical cluster2.19e-09286
aorta8.83e-0921
aortic system8.83e-0921
anatomical conduit1.93e-07241
mesenchyme2.70e-07238
entire embryonic mesenchyme2.70e-07238


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.