Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2596: Difference between revisions

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Coexpression_clusters
{
|coexpression_dpi_cluster_scores_median=-0.324565592037916

Latest revision as of 12:09, 17 September 2013


Full id: C2596_granulocyte_osteosarcoma_rhabdomyosarcoma_embryonic_acute_Saos2_non



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr1:62902687..62902806,+p1@USP1
Hg19::chr8:121457642..121457672,+p1@MTBP
Hg19::chr8:124408630..124408647,-p2@ATAD2
Hg19::chr8:124408652..124408712,-p1@ATAD2


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br><br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
nucleate cell2.19e-1155
lymphocyte2.18e-1053
common lymphoid progenitor2.18e-1053
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell6.31e-1052
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
cancer9.49e-64235
disease of cellular proliferation4.01e-61239
cell type cancer7.00e-37143
organ system cancer7.13e-29137
carcinoma8.31e-29106
hematologic cancer1.71e-1951
immune system cancer1.71e-1951
leukemia1.22e-1639
myeloid leukemia6.83e-1331
disease of anatomical entity1.02e-0739


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.10.443649
MA0004.10.71247
MA0006.10.532262
MA0007.10.6918
MA0009.11.20602
MA0014.10.0695829
MA0017.10.577281
MA0019.10.873355
MA0024.11.09684
MA0025.11.34373
MA0027.12.83281
MA0028.10.550763
MA0029.11.11704
MA0030.11.10506
MA0031.11.03735
MA0038.10.824639
MA0040.11.12314
MA0041.10.732902
MA0042.10.697662
MA0043.11.20635
MA0046.11.19471
MA0048.10.709734
MA0050.10.69864
MA0051.10.820063
MA0052.11.12718
MA0055.10.396851
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.248209
MA0058.10.605914
MA0059.10.604454
MA0060.10.393285
MA0061.10.360128
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.825101
MA0067.11.53181
MA0068.10.313194
MA0069.11.19071
MA0070.11.17908
MA0071.10.782546
MA0072.11.1744
MA0073.10.100363
MA0074.10.819248
MA0076.10.623864
MA0077.11.16637
MA0078.10.926725
MA0081.10.604638
MA0083.11.21381
MA0084.11.72172
MA0087.11.17185
MA0088.10.536981
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.640115
MA0091.10.715356
MA0092.10.673508
MA0093.10.535768
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.83965
MA0101.10.539569
MA0103.10.521546
MA0105.10.232357
MA0106.10.869173
MA0107.10.453492
MA0108.21.03412
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.655276
MA0113.10.886811
MA0114.10.447443
MA0115.11.45393
MA0116.10.457606
MA0117.11.24497
MA0119.10.586221
MA0122.11.27173
MA0124.11.41151
MA0125.11.32534
MA0130.10
MA0131.10.94608
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.23748
MA0136.10.832277
MA0139.10.344952
MA0140.10.779643
MA0141.10.602484
MA0142.11.00381
MA0143.10.887001
MA0144.10.430413
MA0145.10.195821
MA0146.10.8309
MA0147.10.46175
MA0148.10.739888
MA0149.10.769072
MA0062.21.66396
MA0035.20.778873
MA0039.20.10559
MA0138.20.928035
MA0002.20.379056
MA0137.20.558189
MA0104.20.392359
MA0047.20.856092
MA0112.20.187982
MA0065.20.199162
MA0150.10.633493
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.78681
MA0153.11.30799
MA0154.10.229241
MA0155.10.180766
MA0156.10.560797
MA0157.10.97481
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.462502
MA0160.10.756582
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.640035
MA0163.10.0725493
MA0164.10.90014
MA0080.20.535868
MA0018.20.870662
MA0099.20.7872
MA0079.20.00910927
MA0102.21.75932
MA0258.10.418966
MA0259.10.471671
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
BCLAF1#9774210.82632380506090.01202203816432580.0436568026371356
CTBP2#1488231.35850016966410.001492676882047230.00954120086199465
E2F1#186944.907389214879320.001724022357361790.0106573051778933
E2F4#1874412.66806031528443.88145892637771e-050.00072739222826478
ELF1#199744.258097958807540.003041525565781240.0161008610960833
FAM48A#555781288.79218750.003458231820727350.0175771010864777
GATA1#2623310.17023110785030.001515158168498270.00966478983447085
GTF2B#2959215.97191496716210.005636585723537220.025474030740426
HEY1#2346244.040111043105710.00375304636917980.0186232911935558
IRF4#3662210.95725634337210.01174530180688030.0428515187385166
JUNB#3726322.95797449486590.0001359772504018780.00177939206298982
JUND#372735.245997956403270.01043432751748420.0386985345027888
MAFF#23764228.15767824497260.001846876180367150.0109259035573448
MAFK#7975213.5503665689150.00777202812098050.0319580631098501
MAX#414934.839416631755340.01315737137836840.0466332748289752
MYC#460945.22228187160940.001344309395272740.0088825970475066
NFKB1#479045.488063424193840.001102199566301980.00768339477406303
PAX5#507935.002174148383370.01196533174786410.0435068510397652
PBX3#5090210.95725634337210.01174530180688030.0428530157348044
POU2F2#545249.106124057742520.000145395665174930.0018846937911387
SIN3A#2594245.408884726815140.001168172384885160.00796934846854927
SRF#6722310.34788369662590.001439893778401260.0092400040751121
STAT2#6773232.63188559322030.001379588775125520.00898440307322654
TAF1#687243.343046285745290.008005664898701650.0322533517091194
TAF7#6879411.43306940492395.85061525419808e-050.000970046684447044
TBP#690843.706770687096390.005296377814784350.0244507095698299
TCF12#693837.975848676639820.003090920396013070.0162806453116406
ZNF143#7702310.12565741417090.001534861610688180.00976899334259634



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.