Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4815: Difference between revisions

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Coexpression_clusters
{
|full_id=C4815_merkel_large_carcinoid_medulloblastoma_small_osteosarcoma_Neurons
 

Latest revision as of 14:20, 17 September 2013


Full id: C4815_merkel_large_carcinoid_medulloblastoma_small_osteosarcoma_Neurons



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr9:23688985..23688989,-p@chr9:23688985..23688989
-
Hg19::chr9:23821808..23821827,-p2@ELAVL2
Hg19::chr9:23821842..23821848,-p8@ELAVL2


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
neuron1.09e-096
neuroblast1.09e-096
electrically signaling cell1.09e-096
neuronal stem cell5.55e-098
ectodermal cell1.86e-0772
neural cell4.48e-0725
epithelial cell of alimentary canal5.01e-0720
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
central nervous system3.80e-3281
nervous system8.85e-3289
ectoderm-derived structure1.80e-28171
ectoderm1.80e-28171
presumptive ectoderm1.80e-28171
regional part of nervous system5.22e-2753
regional part of brain5.22e-2753
neural tube2.40e-2656
neural rod2.40e-2656
future spinal cord2.40e-2656
neural keel2.40e-2656
brain1.32e-2568
future brain1.32e-2568
ecto-epithelium3.83e-25104
neocortex5.29e-2220
regional part of cerebral cortex8.79e-2222
neurectoderm9.48e-2286
neural plate3.39e-2182
presumptive neural plate3.39e-2182
brain grey matter5.53e-2134
gray matter5.53e-2134
cerebral hemisphere6.84e-2132
regional part of forebrain9.03e-2141
forebrain9.03e-2141
anterior neural tube9.03e-2141
future forebrain9.03e-2141
telencephalon3.25e-1934
regional part of telencephalon5.41e-1932
cerebral cortex1.81e-1825
pallium1.81e-1825
pre-chordal neural plate2.55e-1861
organ system subdivision2.62e-14223
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest6.42e-13132
organ part6.39e-11218
adult organism3.69e-09114
anatomical cluster6.45e-09373
gyrus1.16e-086
embryo2.82e-08592
occipital lobe3.60e-085
parietal lobe8.49e-085
segmental subdivision of hindbrain1.76e-0712
hindbrain1.76e-0712
presumptive hindbrain1.76e-0712
epithelium2.40e-07306
brainstem3.31e-076
cell layer4.23e-07309
posterior neural tube7.97e-0715
chordal neural plate7.97e-0715
segmental subdivision of nervous system9.41e-0713
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
squamous cell carcinoma8.91e-0714


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.11.0927
MA0004.10.826076
MA0006.10.639288
MA0007.10.804807
MA0009.11.3275
MA0014.11.24048
MA0017.10.686276
MA0019.10.990656
MA0024.11.21731
MA0025.11.46617
MA0027.12.95767
MA0028.10.658629
MA0029.11.23771
MA0030.11.22561
MA0031.11.15713
MA0038.10.94098
MA0040.11.24388
MA0041.10.847069
MA0042.10.810843
MA0043.11.32783
MA0046.11.31611
MA0048.10.341392
MA0050.10.81185
MA0051.10.936307
MA0052.11.24796
MA0055.10.190716
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.333427
MA0058.10.716037
MA0059.10.714521
MA0060.10.492218
MA0061.10.456531
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.941452
MA0067.11.65513
MA0068.10.405474
MA0069.11.31207
MA0070.11.30033
MA0071.10.897953
MA0072.11.29561
MA0073.10.407479
MA0074.10.935474
MA0076.10.734647
MA0077.11.28751
MA0078.11.04495
MA0081.10.714712
MA0083.11.33535
MA0084.11.84562
MA0087.11.29304
MA0088.10.715722
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.751469
MA0091.10.829044
MA0092.10.785956
MA0093.10.642957
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.12.19699
MA0101.10.646932
MA0103.10.628063
MA0105.10.846801
MA0106.10.986396
MA0107.10.556367
MA0108.21.15387
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.767139
MA0113.11.00436
MA0114.10.549955
MA0115.11.57693
MA0116.10.560723
MA0117.11.36676
MA0119.10.695578
MA0122.11.39371
MA0124.11.53432
MA0125.11.44766
MA0130.10
MA0131.11.06461
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.35921
MA0136.10.948776
MA0139.10.440097
MA0140.10.894983
MA0141.10.712476
MA0142.11.12317
MA0143.11.00455
MA0144.10.531867
MA0145.10.273764
MA0146.10.707589
MA0147.10.565108
MA0148.10.854239
MA0149.10.884158
MA0062.20.449458
MA0035.20.894194
MA0039.20.757898
MA0138.21.04628
MA0002.20.476938
MA0137.21.60005
MA0104.21.2307
MA0047.20.973066
MA0112.20.264678
MA0065.20.277623
MA0150.10.744617
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.902317
MA0153.11.43021
MA0154.10.312019
MA0155.10.256269
MA0156.10.669101
MA0157.11.09377
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.565904
MA0160.10.871361
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.8915
MA0163.10.387745
MA0164.11.01792
MA0080.21.55139
MA0018.20.987913
MA0099.20.902716
MA0079.20.941469
MA0102.21.88331
MA0258.10.519674
MA0259.10.575594
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
SUZ12#23512233.41052060737530.00117826764536030.00800371347081521



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.