Coexpression cluster:C3337

Full id: C3337_kidney_umbilical_retina_putamen_Ciliary_brain_caudate

Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr12:80794469..80794483,+	p@chr12:80794469..80794483 +
Hg19::chr12:80794499..80794508,+	p@chr12:80794499..80794508 +
Hg19::chr3:64547432..64547444,-	p@chr3:64547432..64547444 -

Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

---

No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

---

No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>

---

Cell Type

Ontology term	p-value	n
ciliated cell	2.46e-23	3
ciliated epithelial cell	2.46e-23	3
multi-ciliated epithelial cell	2.46e-23	3
non-pigmented ciliary epithelial cell	2.46e-23	3

Uber Anatomy

Ontology term	p-value	n
gyrus	3.29e-30	6
pre-chordal neural plate	2.06e-27	61
neural plate	2.80e-25	82
presumptive neural plate	2.80e-25	82
regional part of cerebral cortex	2.19e-24	22
neurectoderm	5.79e-24	86
ciliary epithelium	2.46e-23	3
ciliary body	2.46e-23	3
ecto-epithelium	8.94e-22	104
cerebral cortex	2.02e-21	25
pallium	2.02e-21	25
neocortex	3.14e-21	20
cerebral hemisphere	1.86e-20	32
regional part of nervous system	2.21e-20	53
regional part of brain	2.21e-20	53
telencephalon	3.37e-19	34
neural tube	3.47e-19	56
neural rod	3.47e-19	56
future spinal cord	3.47e-19	56
neural keel	3.47e-19	56
regional part of forebrain	3.60e-19	41
forebrain	3.60e-19	41
anterior neural tube	3.60e-19	41
future forebrain	3.60e-19	41
atypical epithelium	1.17e-17	4
regional part of telencephalon	1.35e-16	32
middle temporal gyrus	5.83e-16	2
brain grey matter	1.43e-15	34
gray matter	1.43e-15	34
brain	3.45e-15	68
future brain	3.45e-15	68
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest	1.62e-14	132
adult organism	1.96e-13	114
eye	1.87e-12	21
visual system	1.87e-12	21
central nervous system	1.92e-12	81
vasculature of eye	5.88e-12	6
uvea	5.88e-12	6
vasculature of head	5.88e-12	6
ectoderm-derived structure	9.75e-12	171
ectoderm	9.75e-12	171
presumptive ectoderm	9.75e-12	171
pigment epithelium of eye	4.06e-11	11
nervous system	5.36e-11	89
sense organ	7.81e-11	24
sensory system	7.81e-11	24
entire sense organ system	7.81e-11	24
frontal cortex	8.06e-11	3
temporal lobe	3.60e-10	6
camera-type eye	2.81e-09	20
simple eye	2.81e-09	20
immature eye	2.81e-09	20
ocular region	2.81e-09	20
eyeball of camera-type eye	2.81e-09	20
optic cup	2.81e-09	20
optic vesicle	2.81e-09	20
eye primordium	2.81e-09	20
surface	4.52e-09	1
anterior segment of eyeball	9.16e-09	14
occipital pole	9.74e-09	1
pole of cerebral hemisphere	9.74e-09	1
organ part	1.33e-08	218
paracentral gyrus	1.78e-08	1
postcentral gyrus	1.91e-08	1
face	2.05e-08	22
multi-tissue structure	2.76e-07	342
limbic system	8.17e-07	5
epithelium	9.66e-07	306
vasculature of organ	9.90e-07	11

Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data

---

Novel motifs

JASPAR motifs

Motifs	-log10(p-value)
{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}

ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data

---

No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data

---

This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.