Coexpression cluster:C3760

Full id: C3760_lung_bile_large_papillotubular_keratoacanthoma_oral_endometrial

Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr19:16045510..16045553,-	p8@CYP4F11
Hg19::chr19:16045619..16045649,-	p2@CYP4F11
Hg19::chr19:16045665..16045708,-	p1@CYP4F11

Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

---

No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

---

No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>

---

Cell Type

Ontology term	p-value	n
epithelial cell	3.01e-15	253
endodermal cell	4.75e-14	58
endo-epithelial cell	1.12e-11	42

Uber Anatomy

Ontology term	p-value	n
adult organism	2.43e-28	114
organ system subdivision	1.34e-19	223
neural tube	2.72e-19	56
neural rod	2.72e-19	56
future spinal cord	2.72e-19	56
neural keel	2.72e-19	56
regional part of nervous system	4.02e-17	53
regional part of brain	4.02e-17	53
central nervous system	9.94e-15	81
regional part of forebrain	2.17e-14	41
forebrain	2.17e-14	41
anterior neural tube	2.17e-14	41
future forebrain	2.17e-14	41
brain	4.71e-14	68
future brain	4.71e-14	68
anatomical conduit	8.53e-14	240
brain grey matter	1.08e-12	34
gray matter	1.08e-12	34
telencephalon	1.28e-12	34
trunk region element	1.98e-12	101
endoderm-derived structure	5.64e-12	160
endoderm	5.64e-12	160
presumptive endoderm	5.64e-12	160
nervous system	6.63e-12	89
foregut	1.18e-11	87
regional part of telencephalon	2.61e-11	32
anatomical cluster	2.69e-11	373
cerebral hemisphere	2.97e-11	32
organ	3.98e-11	503
multi-tissue structure	4.36e-11	342
ecto-epithelium	5.31e-11	104
tube	6.31e-11	192
digestive system	1.05e-10	145
digestive tract	1.05e-10	145
primitive gut	1.05e-10	145
neural plate	1.12e-10	82
presumptive neural plate	1.12e-10	82
subdivision of digestive tract	6.64e-10	118
endo-epithelium	1.09e-09	82
neurectoderm	1.23e-09	86
regional part of cerebral cortex	2.06e-09	22
immaterial anatomical entity	3.07e-09	117
subdivision of trunk	1.05e-08	112
ectoderm-derived structure	1.32e-08	171
ectoderm	1.32e-08	171
presumptive ectoderm	1.32e-08	171
pre-chordal neural plate	3.23e-08	61
respiratory system	5.88e-08	74
neocortex	6.17e-08	20
cerebral cortex	9.32e-08	25
pallium	9.32e-08	25
epithelium	1.16e-07	306
thoracic cavity element	1.73e-07	34
thoracic cavity	1.73e-07	34
developing anatomical structure	2.05e-07	581
cell layer	2.28e-07	309
thoracic segment organ	4.08e-07	35
neural nucleus	5.59e-07	9
nucleus of brain	5.59e-07	9
abdomen element	6.07e-07	54
abdominal segment element	6.07e-07	54
epithelial bud	6.84e-07	37
basal ganglion	6.92e-07	9
nuclear complex of neuraxis	6.92e-07	9
aggregate regional part of brain	6.92e-07	9
collection of basal ganglia	6.92e-07	9
cerebral subcortex	6.92e-07	9
embryo	7.20e-07	592

Disease

Ontology term	p-value	n
carcinoma	5.49e-18	106
squamous cell carcinoma	1.68e-12	14
cell type cancer	5.26e-12	143
adenocarcinoma	9.05e-12	25

Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data

---

Novel motifs

JASPAR motifs

Motifs	-log10(p-value)
{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}

ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data

---

(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF	#promoters	Enrichment	p-value	q-value
ELF1#1997	3	4.25809795880754	0.0129517987505461	0.0462136286200302

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data

---

This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.