Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2557

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 12:08, 17 September 2013 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2557_Neutrophils_CD14_Mast_lymph_spleen_blood_Monocytederived



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr1:206760473..206760494,+p@chr1:206760473..206760494
+
Hg19::chr1:31211884..31211922,-p@chr1:31211884..31211922
-
Hg19::chr2:175436767..175436788,-p18@WIPF1
Hg19::chr6:30584283..30584306,-p@chr6:30584283..30584306
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
leukocyte4.96e-58136
hematopoietic stem cell5.00e-50168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell5.00e-50168
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell1.53e-49120
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell1.97e-47161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell1.97e-47161
hematopoietic cell3.37e-47177
nongranular leukocyte1.34e-46115
myeloid leukocyte6.38e-3872
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell5.53e-3467
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell2.52e-3366
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor6.30e-3161
myeloid cell1.46e-30108
common myeloid progenitor1.46e-30108
monopoietic cell9.91e-3059
monocyte9.91e-3059
monoblast9.91e-3059
promonocyte9.91e-3059
defensive cell2.51e-2948
phagocyte2.51e-2948
classical monocyte4.57e-2742
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte4.57e-2742
lymphocyte8.39e-1553
common lymphoid progenitor8.39e-1553
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell1.07e-1452
nucleate cell1.13e-1455
stuff accumulating cell1.38e-1187
mesenchymal cell9.21e-10354
connective tissue cell1.04e-08361
mature alpha-beta T cell6.92e-0818
alpha-beta T cell6.92e-0818
immature T cell6.92e-0818
mature T cell6.92e-0818
immature alpha-beta T cell6.92e-0818
lymphocyte of B lineage2.34e-0724
pro-B cell2.34e-0724
T cell5.33e-0725
pro-T cell5.33e-0725
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic system9.24e-3998
blood island9.24e-3998
hemolymphoid system1.24e-35108
immune system2.58e-2993
bone marrow3.77e-2976
bone element8.52e-2582
skeletal element5.07e-2090
adult organism1.28e-17114
skeletal system3.43e-17100
lateral plate mesoderm1.75e-11203
connective tissue1.06e-07371
blood4.84e-0715
haemolymphatic fluid4.84e-0715
organism substance4.84e-0715


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.10.720743
MA0004.10.71247
MA0006.10.532262
MA0007.10.6918
MA0009.11.20602
MA0014.10.244769
MA0017.10.577281
MA0019.10.873355
MA0024.11.09684
MA0025.11.34373
MA0027.12.83281
MA0028.10.550763
MA0029.11.11704
MA0030.11.10506
MA0031.11.03735
MA0038.10.824639
MA0040.11.12314
MA0041.10.732902
MA0042.10.697662
MA0043.11.20635
MA0046.11.19471
MA0048.10.709734
MA0050.10.69864
MA0051.10.820063
MA0052.11.12718
MA0055.10.791759
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.69331
MA0058.10.605914
MA0059.10.604454
MA0060.10.393285
MA0061.10.360128
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.825101
MA0067.11.53181
MA0068.11.52107
MA0069.11.19071
MA0070.11.17908
MA0071.10.782546
MA0072.11.1744
MA0073.10.214613
MA0074.10.819248
MA0076.10.623864
MA0077.11.16637
MA0078.10.926725
MA0081.10.604638
MA0083.11.21381
MA0084.11.72172
MA0087.11.17185
MA0088.10.182167
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.640115
MA0091.10.715356
MA0092.10.673508
MA0093.10.535768
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.83965
MA0101.10.539569
MA0103.10.521546
MA0105.10.656404
MA0106.10.869173
MA0107.10.453492
MA0108.21.03412
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.655276
MA0113.10.886811
MA0114.10.447443
MA0115.11.45393
MA0116.10.457606
MA0117.11.24497
MA0119.10.586221
MA0122.11.27173
MA0124.11.41151
MA0125.11.32534
MA0130.10
MA0131.10.94608
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.23748
MA0136.10.832277
MA0139.10.344952
MA0140.10.779643
MA0141.10.602484
MA0142.11.00381
MA0143.10.887001
MA0144.10.430413
MA0145.10.195821
MA0146.10.221129
MA0147.10.46175
MA0148.10.739888
MA0149.10.769072
MA0062.20.353589
MA0035.20.778873
MA0039.20.10559
MA0138.20.928035
MA0002.20.379056
MA0137.20.558189
MA0104.20.392359
MA0047.20.856092
MA0112.20.187982
MA0065.20.577908
MA0150.10.633493
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.78681
MA0153.11.30799
MA0154.10.229241
MA0155.11.02191
MA0156.10.560797
MA0157.10.97481
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.462502
MA0160.10.756582
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.0928415
MA0163.10.918944
MA0164.10.90014
MA0080.20.535868
MA0018.20.870662
MA0099.20.7872
MA0079.20.869502
MA0102.21.75932
MA0258.10.418966
MA0259.10.471671
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.