Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2064

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 11:58, 17 September 2013 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2064_Intestinal_choriocarcinoma_breast_Prostate_pancreatic_colon_MCF7



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr10:5535609..5535633,-p@chr10:5535609..5535633
-
Hg19::chr10:5535635..5535648,-p@chr10:5535635..5535648
-
Hg19::chr10:5535762..5535773,-p@chr10:5535762..5535773
-
Hg19::chr6:3789350..3789355,-p@chr6:3789350..3789355
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>

Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
chorionic membrane mesenchymal stem cell3.09e-253
germ line cell1.06e-117
germ cell1.06e-117
intestinal epithelial cell1.26e-094
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
acellular anatomical structure3.09e-253
egg chorion3.09e-253
chorion3.77e-197
breast9.17e-1410
chest1.57e-1211
extraembryonic membrane1.11e-0914
membranous layer1.11e-0914
intestinal mucosa1.26e-094
wall of intestine1.26e-094
gastrointestinal system mucosa1.26e-094
gastrointestinal system epithelium1.26e-094
intestinal epithelium1.26e-094
gut epithelium8.65e-0754
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
thoracic cancer5.36e-344
breast cancer5.36e-344
cell type cancer1.82e-10143
islet cell tumor6.31e-101
endocrine pancreas cancer6.31e-101
pancreatic endocrine carcinoma6.31e-101
disease of anatomical entity1.20e-0939
carcinoma3.39e-09106


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data

Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.10.720743
MA0004.10.71247
MA0006.10.532262
MA0007.10.6918
MA0009.11.20602
MA0014.10.0695829
MA0017.11.41335
MA0019.12.02743
MA0024.11.09684
MA0025.11.34373
MA0027.12.83281
MA0028.10.550763
MA0029.11.11704
MA0030.14.06701
MA0031.12.36201
MA0038.10.824639
MA0040.11.12314
MA0041.10.732902
MA0042.10.697662
MA0043.11.20635
MA0046.11.19471
MA0048.10.25531
MA0050.10.69864
MA0051.10.820063
MA0052.11.12718
MA0055.10.125954
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.248209
MA0058.10.605914
MA0059.10.604454
MA0060.10.393285
MA0061.10.360128
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.825101
MA0067.11.53181
MA0068.10.313194
MA0069.11.19071
MA0070.11.17908
MA0071.10.782546
MA0072.11.1744
MA0073.10.00636811
MA0074.10.819248
MA0076.10.623864
MA0077.11.16637
MA0078.10.926725
MA0081.10.604638
MA0083.11.21381
MA0084.11.72172
MA0087.11.17185
MA0088.10.182167
MA0089.10
MA0090.12.61689
MA0091.10.715356
MA0092.10.673508
MA0093.10.535768
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.83965
MA0101.10.539569
MA0103.10.521546
MA0105.10.656404
MA0106.10.869173
MA0107.10.453492
MA0108.21.03412
MA0109.10
MA0111.11.57689
MA0113.10.886811
MA0114.10.447443
MA0115.11.45393
MA0116.10.457606
MA0117.11.24497
MA0119.10.586221
MA0122.11.27173
MA0124.11.41151
MA0125.11.32534
MA0130.10
MA0131.10.94608
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.23748
MA0136.10.832277
MA0139.10.344952
MA0140.10.779643
MA0141.11.46638
MA0142.11.00381
MA0143.10.887001
MA0144.10.430413
MA0145.10.195821
MA0146.10.481
MA0147.10.46175
MA0148.12.93423
MA0149.10.769072
MA0062.20.353589
MA0035.20.778873
MA0039.20.0247757
MA0138.20.928035
MA0002.20.379056
MA0137.20.558189
MA0104.20.392359
MA0047.23.29861
MA0112.20.187982
MA0065.21.09513
MA0150.10.633493
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.78681
MA0153.11.30799
MA0154.11.88496
MA0155.10.180766
MA0156.10.560797
MA0157.12.23474
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.462502
MA0160.10.756582
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.0928415
MA0163.11.90765
MA0164.10.90014
MA0080.20.535868
MA0018.20.870662
MA0099.20.7872
MA0079.20.0626799
MA0102.21.75932
MA0258.10.418966
MA0259.10.471671
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data

(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CEBPB#105147.971147625824820.0002476385788090830.00267429692195655
EP300#203346.77394172622320.0004748459821442640.0043338669517753
ESR1#2099323.07645247211590.0001339105244968570.00175697000853357
FOXA1#3169411.08141974938556.62943068949433e-050.00106896883090952
FOXA2#3170424.63046375266522.71504128667089e-069.41421636582406e-05
GATA3#2625320.42738726790450.0001924415576258320.00231842240591582
HDAC2#3066413.41562023662633.0859005065161e-050.000625559710791993
HNF4G#3174428.75342252644681.46167379934821e-065.65601148314664e-05
SP1#666745.69838137814090.0009482606065333980.00682908491833827
TCF7L2#6934410.77017656313737.42969445082454e-050.0011516026398778



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data

This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.

Retrieved from "http://f5-webapp4.gsc.riken.jp/resource_browser/index.php?title=Coexpression_cluster:C2064&oldid=3069181"