Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1656

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 11:49, 17 September 2013 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1656_CD14CD16_CD14_CD4_Basophils_CD8_Natural_immature



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr12:109025991..109025997,+p@chr12:109025991..109025997
+
Hg19::chr17:76835866..76835913,+p@chr17:76835866..76835913
+
Hg19::chr17:76836459..76836475,+p@chr17:76836459..76836475
+
Hg19::chr1:245134406..245134424,+p@chr1:245134406..245134424
+
Hg19::chr1:6663744..6663762,-p3@KLHL21


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
leukocyte2.64e-60136
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell6.05e-50120
nongranular leukocyte7.84e-49115
hematopoietic stem cell7.15e-47168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell7.15e-47168
hematopoietic cell1.14e-44177
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell2.90e-42161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell2.90e-42161
classical monocyte3.52e-4142
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte3.52e-4142
defensive cell1.51e-3548
phagocyte1.51e-3548
myeloid leukocyte8.13e-3572
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell2.63e-3367
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor8.47e-3061
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell5.73e-2966
monopoietic cell6.89e-2859
monocyte6.89e-2859
monoblast6.89e-2859
promonocyte6.89e-2859
myeloid cell1.74e-23108
common myeloid progenitor1.74e-23108
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell6.52e-1852
lymphocyte2.44e-1753
common lymphoid progenitor2.44e-1753
nucleate cell2.92e-1655
mature alpha-beta T cell2.32e-1418
alpha-beta T cell2.32e-1418
immature T cell2.32e-1418
mature T cell2.32e-1418
immature alpha-beta T cell2.32e-1418
mesenchymal cell2.34e-14354
T cell2.94e-1425
pro-T cell2.94e-1425
connective tissue cell2.02e-13361
stuff accumulating cell2.16e-1387
intermediate monocyte3.86e-129
CD14-positive, CD16-positive monocyte3.86e-129
motile cell8.92e-12386
CD4-positive, alpha-beta T cell3.06e-086
multi fate stem cell7.33e-08427
stem cell9.24e-08441
CD8-positive, alpha-beta T cell1.39e-0711
somatic stem cell2.41e-07433
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
bone marrow8.38e-3076
bone element1.83e-2782
hematopoietic system1.40e-2698
blood island1.40e-2698
skeletal element2.69e-2390
immune system3.96e-2393
hemolymphoid system3.61e-22108
skeletal system4.31e-19100
connective tissue1.52e-12371


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.12.24383
MA0004.10.626788
MA0006.10.452993
MA0007.10.606704
MA0009.11.11255
MA0014.10.161847
MA0017.11.24112
MA0019.10.784036
MA0024.11.00439
MA0025.11.24931
MA0027.12.73598
MA0028.10.470679
MA0029.11.02437
MA0030.11.01252
MA0031.10.945567
MA0038.10.736268
MA0040.11.03042
MA0041.10.64667
MA0042.10.612397
MA0043.11.11288
MA0046.11.10134
MA0048.11.08193
MA0050.10.613347
MA0051.10.731787
MA0052.11.03442
MA0055.11.01397
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.189508
MA0058.10.523638
MA0059.10.522232
MA0060.10.321781
MA0061.10.291022
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.736721
MA0067.11.43651
MA0068.10.247962
MA0069.12.48388
MA0070.11.08584
MA0071.10.695094
MA0072.11.0812
MA0073.10.111822
MA0074.10.730989
MA0076.10.540943
MA0077.11.07324
MA0078.10.836493
MA0081.10.522409
MA0083.11.12028
MA0084.11.62584
MA0087.11.07867
MA0088.10.132006
MA0089.10
MA0090.11.36977
MA0091.10.629594
MA0092.10.588959
MA0093.10.456342
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.750974
MA0101.10.459973
MA0103.10.442769
MA0105.10.520776
MA0106.10.779931
MA0107.10.378225
MA0108.20.94238
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.5713
MA0113.10.797251
MA0114.10.372523
MA0115.11.35895
MA0116.10.382106
MA0117.11.1512
MA0119.11.25946
MA0122.11.17777
MA0124.11.31673
MA0125.11.23103
MA0130.10
MA0131.10.855546
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.14377
MA0136.10.743749
MA0139.10.759606
MA0140.10.692258
MA0141.11.29278
MA0142.10.912455
MA0143.10.797437
MA0144.10.356507
MA0145.10.143698
MA0146.11.82062
MA0147.10.386018
MA0148.10.653474
MA0149.10.681935
MA0062.20.284987
MA0035.20.691506
MA0039.20.15493
MA0138.20.837782
MA0002.20.30855
MA0137.20.47779
MA0104.20.320919
MA0047.20.767096
MA0112.21.96224
MA0065.20.146576
MA0150.10.550239
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.69926
MA0153.11.21379
MA0154.10.514087
MA0155.10.409315
MA0156.10.480289
MA0157.10.883854
MA0158.10
MA0159.11.00463
MA0160.10.669748
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.81299
MA0163.10.382496
MA0164.10.810347
MA0080.20.456437
MA0018.20.781393
MA0099.20.699641
MA0079.20.00732454
MA0102.21.66336
MA0258.10.914277
MA0259.10.395396
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
HDAC8#558691155.3168067226890.006421962435230970.0279285169591125
MXI1#460135.976942977255580.008653004889366880.0329412837224097
MYC#460944.177825497287520.005691969036823440.0256699004334055
SIN3A#2594244.327107781452110.004977052855762880.0232384845852566



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.