Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:3142

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 22:28, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr18:45719460..45719470,+p19@Kcnn2
Mm9::chr18:45719472..45719535,+p4@Kcnn2
Mm9::chr18:45719542..45719559,+p12@Kcnn2


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
central nervous system5.84e-3173
regional part of nervous system7.23e-3154
nervous system1.42e-2975
neural tube3.24e-2952
neural rod3.24e-2952
future spinal cord3.24e-2952
neural keel3.24e-2952
brain1.86e-2747
future brain1.86e-2747
regional part of brain1.76e-2646
neurectoderm7.48e-2664
neural plate7.48e-2664
presumptive neural plate7.48e-2664
ectoderm-derived structure4.92e-2495
ectoderm4.92e-2495
presumptive ectoderm4.92e-2495
anterior neural tube1.13e-2240
ecto-epithelium1.66e-2273
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest3.12e-2292
gray matter3.40e-2234
regional part of forebrain5.30e-2239
forebrain5.30e-2239
future forebrain5.30e-2239
brain grey matter8.53e-2129
regional part of telencephalon8.53e-2129
telencephalon8.53e-2129
pre-chordal neural plate4.95e-2049
anatomical conduit1.23e-15122
cerebral cortex1.29e-1521
cerebral hemisphere1.29e-1521
pallium1.29e-1521
tube2.89e-15114
regional part of cerebral cortex5.69e-1317
occipital lobe4.61e-0810
visual cortex4.61e-0810
neocortex4.61e-0810
posterior neural tube5.59e-0712
chordal neural plate5.59e-0712
organ system subdivision8.11e-07194


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}