Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:2484

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 21:29, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr8:87237692..87237703,-p12@Nfix
Mm9::chr8:87237711..87237727,-p11@Nfix
Mm9::chr8:87237732..87237745,-p7@Nfix
Mm9::chr8:87245570..87245596,-p@chr8:87245570..87245596
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
anatomical conduit3.65e-13122
tube3.25e-12114
cerebral cortex1.38e-0921
cerebral hemisphere1.38e-0921
pallium1.38e-0921
neural tube9.89e-0952
neural rod9.89e-0952
future spinal cord9.89e-0952
neural keel9.89e-0952
brain1.01e-0847
future brain1.01e-0847
regional part of brain1.27e-0846
ecto-epithelium2.81e-0873
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest3.54e-0892
neurectoderm5.78e-0864
neural plate5.78e-0864
presumptive neural plate5.78e-0864
regional part of nervous system9.65e-0854
brain grey matter1.55e-0729
regional part of telencephalon1.55e-0729
telencephalon1.55e-0729
pre-chordal neural plate3.14e-0749
regional part of cerebral cortex3.46e-0717
gray matter3.61e-0734
anterior neural tube5.55e-0740
regional part of forebrain5.69e-0739
forebrain5.69e-0739
future forebrain5.69e-0739
multi-cellular organism6.08e-07333


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}