Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:1070

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 19:21, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr11:34652618..34652627,-p@chr11:34652618..34652627
-
Mm9::chr11:8346136..8346157,-p@chr11:8346136..8346157
-
Mm9::chr11:8346236..8346239,-p@chr11:8346236..8346239
-
Mm9::chr11:8346289..8346294,-p@chr11:8346289..8346294
-
Mm9::chr14:17005834..17005835,-p@chr14:17005834..17005835
-
Mm9::chr9:110812168..110812196,-p@chr9:110812168..110812196
-
Mm9::chr9:110823338..110823348,-p@chr9:110823338..110823348
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
thymus7.48e-1323
neck7.48e-1323
respiratory system epithelium7.48e-1323
hemolymphoid system gland7.48e-1323
pharyngeal epithelium7.48e-1323
thymic region7.48e-1323
pharyngeal gland7.48e-1323
entire pharyngeal arch endoderm7.48e-1323
thymus primordium7.48e-1323
early pharyngeal endoderm7.48e-1323
pharynx2.40e-1224
gland of gut2.40e-1224
upper respiratory tract2.40e-1224
chordate pharynx2.40e-1224
pharyngeal arch system2.40e-1224
pharyngeal region of foregut2.40e-1224
segment of respiratory tract4.75e-1127
hemopoietic organ2.47e-1029
immune organ2.47e-1029
mixed endoderm/mesoderm-derived structure1.14e-0835
organ segment1.14e-0835
craniocervical region1.91e-0836
respiratory tract1.74e-0741
respiratory system2.54e-0742
anterior region of body3.65e-0743
hematopoietic system7.19e-0745
blood island7.19e-0745


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}