Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:653

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 18:42, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr11:48613859..48613871,+p1@Gnb2l1
Mm9::chr17:27772183..27772212,-p1@Rps10
Mm9::chr1:63223693..63223719,+p1@Eef1b2
Mm9::chr2:38860646..38860665,-p1@Rpl35
Mm9::chr6:115758754..115758772,-p1@Gm6251
p1@LOC100504872
p1@Rpl32
Mm9::chr7:106632155..106632164,-p1@Rps3
Mm9::chr7:13507664..13507669,+p1@Rps5
Mm9::chr7:148364406..148364417,-p@chr7:148364406..148364417
-
Mm9::chr7:29766806..29766840,-p1@Eif3k
Mm9::chr7:31270201..31270202,-p@chr7:31270201..31270202
-
Mm9::chr7:52384095..52384117,-p1@Rpl13a


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0003735structural constituent of ribosome2.14227013399588e-07
GO:0006412translation2.14227013399588e-07
GO:0009059macromolecule biosynthetic process1.62782180421349e-06
GO:0044249cellular biosynthetic process6.19899724867458e-06
GO:0005840ribosome7.3803168895522e-06
GO:0030529ribonucleoprotein complex7.3803168895522e-06
GO:0032991macromolecular complex1.74087010791727e-05
GO:0009058biosynthetic process1.8565482700779e-05
GO:0033279ribosomal subunit2.34000542491042e-05
GO:0005737cytoplasm0.000524415379759629
GO:0015935small ribosomal subunit0.000673866954367357
GO:0044267cellular protein metabolic process0.00146823999856862
GO:0044260cellular macromolecule metabolic process0.00146823999856862
GO:0010467gene expression0.00146823999856862
GO:0019538protein metabolic process0.00156058478201128
GO:0008135translation factor activity, nucleic acid binding0.00697090241983966
GO:0044424intracellular part0.0112810809464035
GO:0005853eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1 complex0.0112810809464035
GO:0043232intracellular non-membrane-bound organelle0.0112810809464035
GO:0043228non-membrane-bound organelle0.0112810809464035
GO:0005622intracellular0.0127110624320008
GO:0043234protein complex0.0127110624320008
GO:0022613ribonucleoprotein complex biogenesis and assembly0.0127110624320008
GO:0005080protein kinase C binding0.0130239586364739
GO:0044444cytoplasmic part0.0192100984712154
GO:0007205protein kinase C activation0.0205895928338391
GO:0043170macromolecule metabolic process0.036778582067945
GO:0007200G-protein signaling, coupled to IP3 second messenger (phospholipase C activating)0.0458200732709139
GO:0032147activation of protein kinase activity0.0458200732709139
GO:0003746translation elongation factor activity0.0458200732709139
GO:0015934large ribosomal subunit0.0458200732709139
GO:0005834heterotrimeric G-protein complex0.0458200732709139



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
motile cell4.65e-1654
connective tissue cell2.90e-1546
mesenchymal cell2.90e-1546
hematopoietic cell3.03e-1532
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell3.03e-1532
hematopoietic stem cell3.03e-1532
angioblastic mesenchymal cell3.03e-1532
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell3.03e-1532
stem cell2.78e-1397
somatic cell1.60e-12118
animal cell2.89e-12115
eukaryotic cell2.89e-12115
somatic stem cell1.34e-1191
multi fate stem cell1.34e-1191
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell3.48e-1125
nucleate cell1.11e-0816
lymphocyte1.71e-0813
common lymphoid progenitor1.71e-0813
leukocyte1.90e-0817
nongranular leukocyte1.90e-0817
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell2.22e-0812
common myeloid progenitor4.54e-0819
T cell7.43e-0811
pro-T cell7.43e-0811
mature alpha-beta T cell8.03e-079
alpha-beta T cell8.03e-079
immature T cell8.03e-079
mature T cell8.03e-079
immature alpha-beta T cell8.03e-079

Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
connective tissue2.90e-1546
hemolymphoid system7.36e-0848
immune system7.36e-0848
hematopoietic system1.11e-0745
blood island1.11e-0745
bone marrow4.66e-0716


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}