Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4594

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:50, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4594_CD14_immature_CD19_Basophils_Dendritic_migratory_Eosinophils



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr6:32636121..32636132,-p11@HLA-DQB1
Hg19::chr6:32636145..32636158,-p8@HLA-DQB1
Hg19::chr6:32636163..32636177,-p4@HLA-DQB1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
leukocyte2.90e-64136
nongranular leukocyte2.69e-52115
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell1.10e-49120
hematopoietic stem cell1.15e-49168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell1.15e-49168
hematopoietic cell1.66e-46177
classical monocyte1.88e-4442
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte1.88e-4442
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell6.60e-44161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell6.60e-44161
defensive cell5.30e-3848
phagocyte5.30e-3848
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor3.48e-3361
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell7.54e-3267
monopoietic cell1.10e-3159
monocyte1.10e-3159
monoblast1.10e-3159
promonocyte1.10e-3159
myeloid leukocyte1.47e-3172
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell8.26e-3066
myeloid cell2.79e-25108
common myeloid progenitor2.79e-25108
B cell2.59e-1814
stuff accumulating cell7.49e-1887
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell2.42e-1752
lymphocyte6.35e-1753
common lymphoid progenitor6.35e-1753
mesenchymal cell7.22e-17354
connective tissue cell2.73e-16361
nucleate cell3.93e-1655
motile cell2.93e-14386
dendritic cell4.51e-1410
stem cell1.84e-12441
lymphocyte of B lineage4.33e-1224
pro-B cell4.33e-1224
multi fate stem cell8.88e-12427
somatic stem cell1.95e-11433
Langerhans cell4.65e-115
plasmacytoid dendritic cell1.15e-103
conventional dendritic cell2.93e-098
intermediate monocyte3.03e-099
CD14-positive, CD16-positive monocyte3.03e-099
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
bone marrow3.26e-2776
hematopoietic system2.78e-2698
blood island2.78e-2698
bone element1.10e-2482
hemolymphoid system4.46e-23108
immune system1.60e-2293
skeletal element7.68e-2290
skeletal system6.31e-19100
connective tissue1.67e-15371
lateral plate mesoderm2.87e-09203
musculoskeletal system1.59e-08167


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
EP300#203336.77394172622320.003216880500103790.0168286807528722
MEF2A#4205318.74323090964410.0001518243905622470.00195420107541662
NFKB1#479035.488063424193840.006049381815655430.0270725194945896
PAX5#507936.669565531177830.003370290999677260.0173607803558714
RFX5#5993312.04791082719510.0005717246050312580.00486557578429429
SP1#666735.69838137814090.005403962701712170.0247732622510805



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.