Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4519

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:47, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4519_medial_Neurons_brain_duodenum_Mesothelial_amygdala_cerebral



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr5:73936195..73936201,-p19@ENC1
Hg19::chr5:73936230..73936235,-p11@ENC1
Hg19::chr5:73936268..73936275,-p12@ENC1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
cerebral hemisphere8.56e-2332
cerebral cortex1.69e-2225
pallium1.69e-2225
telencephalon2.90e-2234
regional part of telencephalon8.90e-2132
neocortex1.13e-1920
regional part of cerebral cortex2.86e-1922
brain grey matter4.91e-1934
gray matter4.91e-1934
regional part of forebrain2.17e-1841
forebrain2.17e-1841
anterior neural tube2.17e-1841
future forebrain2.17e-1841
central nervous system2.38e-1581
regional part of nervous system5.22e-1453
regional part of brain5.22e-1453
nervous system6.26e-1489
neural tube1.05e-1356
neural rod1.05e-1356
future spinal cord1.05e-1356
neural keel1.05e-1356
pre-chordal neural plate1.04e-1261
brain5.58e-1268
future brain5.58e-1268
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest9.95e-10132
neural plate1.94e-0982
presumptive neural plate1.94e-0982
neurectoderm1.58e-0886
organ system subdivision4.43e-08223
gyrus5.17e-086
ecto-epithelium1.63e-07104
anatomical cluster2.31e-07373
tube2.87e-07192
temporal lobe3.11e-076
parietal lobe3.68e-075
ectoderm-derived structure7.12e-07171
ectoderm7.12e-07171
presumptive ectoderm7.12e-07171


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CCNT2#90536.336201576962630.003930750035764890.0190914571448286
CTBP2#1488362.71700033932814.049570681927e-060.000130293626755938
CTCF#1066435.360256373075030.0064925092527670.0280972599283029
E2F1#186934.907389214879320.008460985347239390.0327243953886729
ELF1#199734.258097958807540.01295179875054610.0464516795916306
FOS#235338.99795530889440.001372499272417130.00901014843874364
MYC#460935.22228187160940.007020843755740150.0295760689337587
NANOG#79923329.24477848101273.99627955670032e-050.000740144423873426
NFKB1#479035.488063424193840.006049381815655430.0270632421265898
PAX5#507936.669565531177830.003370290999677260.0173556442835804
RAD21#5885310.35503389545630.0009004912073565420.00667563892710888
REST#597839.650028716128020.001112636247114590.00770574383371357
SIN3A#2594235.408884726815140.006318961977991520.0277977368274064
SMC3#9126315.04493284493280.0002935825420371870.00310495869446296
TAF7#6879311.43306940492390.0006690181981945830.00545105255119707
TCF7L2#6934310.77017656313730.0008003181298398380.00616677181365965
YY1#752834.911170749853860.008441455341808260.0330912527003646
ZBTB7A#5134137.35190930787590.002516255860282270.0140773112166284
ZNF263#1012738.221841637010680.001799043925565870.0109941690194368



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.