Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4200

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:36, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4200_Mast_immature_CD4_Natural_CD8_Basophils_hairy



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr2:235403097..235403137,+p@chr2:235403097..235403137
+
Hg19::chr6:159071015..159071096,+p1@SYTL3
Hg19::chr6:159071097..159071104,+p9@SYTL3


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
leukocyte2.02e-50136
hematopoietic cell1.33e-38177
hematopoietic stem cell6.27e-38168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell6.27e-38168
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell3.20e-36120
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell4.88e-35161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell4.88e-35161
nongranular leukocyte2.29e-33115
myeloid leukocyte8.92e-3272
classical monocyte8.22e-2942
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte8.22e-2942
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell3.39e-2567
defensive cell1.33e-2448
phagocyte1.33e-2448
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell6.07e-2366
myeloid cell1.04e-22108
common myeloid progenitor1.04e-22108
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor1.51e-2161
monopoietic cell5.86e-2059
monocyte5.86e-2059
monoblast5.86e-2059
promonocyte5.86e-2059
T cell8.97e-2025
pro-T cell8.97e-2025
mature alpha-beta T cell5.81e-1918
alpha-beta T cell5.81e-1918
immature T cell5.81e-1918
mature T cell5.81e-1918
immature alpha-beta T cell5.81e-1918
CD8-positive, alpha-beta T cell4.45e-1211
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell1.08e-1152
lymphocyte2.80e-1153
common lymphoid progenitor2.80e-1153
nucleate cell1.67e-1055
granulocyte3.90e-108
mesenchymal cell1.36e-08354
blood cell1.72e-0811
CD4-positive, alpha-beta T cell6.71e-086
connective tissue cell6.94e-08361
stuff accumulating cell9.37e-0887
circulating cell2.84e-076
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic system4.62e-3398
blood island4.62e-3398
hemolymphoid system4.92e-30108
immune system6.37e-2493
bone marrow3.31e-2376
bone element5.82e-2282
skeletal element2.18e-1890
skeletal system8.29e-15100
lateral plate mesoderm1.50e-09203
adult organism1.69e-08114
connective tissue2.90e-07371
blood4.26e-0715
haemolymphatic fluid4.26e-0715
organism substance4.26e-0715


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
BCL11A#53335218.91297006907140.003639406248379680.0183914428400119
BCL3#602223.03140186915890.002464674760842910.0138577748235624
MEF2A#4205212.4954872730960.008235029478029740.0324930387871075
MEF2C#4208227.54090299508270.001729119938369690.010649735050032



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.