Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4029

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:30, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4029_Mast_tubular_mature_duodenum_brain_temporal_mesodermal



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr20:34680580..34680591,+p10@EPB41L1
Hg19::chr20:34680595..34680608,+p5@EPB41L1
Hg19::chr20:34680623..34680655,+p2@EPB41L1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
epithelial cell4.98e-08253
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
adult organism4.26e-20114
neural tube6.41e-2056
neural rod6.41e-2056
future spinal cord6.41e-2056
neural keel6.41e-2056
anatomical cluster7.38e-20373
central nervous system1.07e-1981
brain1.41e-1968
future brain1.41e-1968
regional part of nervous system6.87e-1953
regional part of brain6.87e-1953
organ system subdivision1.42e-17223
nervous system2.48e-1689
regional part of forebrain1.20e-1541
forebrain1.20e-1541
anterior neural tube1.20e-1541
future forebrain1.20e-1541
neural plate2.29e-1582
presumptive neural plate2.29e-1582
anatomical conduit3.21e-15240
brain grey matter3.50e-1534
gray matter3.50e-1534
telencephalon6.96e-1534
cerebral hemisphere9.14e-1532
regional part of cerebral cortex3.24e-1422
regional part of telencephalon4.23e-1432
neurectoderm1.27e-1386
neocortex1.73e-1320
tube3.58e-13192
organ part3.18e-12218
multi-tissue structure2.33e-11342
cerebral cortex4.68e-1125
pallium4.68e-1125
organ6.17e-11503
pre-chordal neural plate6.24e-1161
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest3.64e-10132
ectoderm-derived structure4.55e-10171
ectoderm4.55e-10171
presumptive ectoderm4.55e-10171
ecto-epithelium8.98e-10104
multi-cellular organism1.36e-09656
anatomical system1.90e-08624
embryo2.26e-08592
developing anatomical structure2.68e-08581
anatomical group3.04e-08625
epithelium7.88e-08306
cell layer9.30e-08309
embryonic structure4.68e-07564
germ layer7.14e-07560
germ layer / neural crest7.14e-07560
embryonic tissue7.14e-07560
presumptive structure7.14e-07560
germ layer / neural crest derived structure7.14e-07560
epiblast (generic)7.14e-07560
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
carcinoma1.35e-08106


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
E2F1#186934.907389214879320.008460985347239390.0325832171342306
E2F6#187635.017155731697390.00791769806886330.0322762087671356
ELF1#199734.258097958807540.01295179875054610.0462942917180014
ZBTB7A#5134137.35190930787590.002516255860282270.0140397075431146



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.