Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3974

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:28, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3974_basal_Olfactory_Preadipocyte_tenocyte_Fibroblast_mesodermal_spindle



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr1:3447901..3447910,-p4@MEGF6
Hg19::chr1:3447923..3447933,-p3@MEGF6
Hg19::chr1:3447967..3447983,-p1@MEGF6


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
lining cell2.00e-0858
barrier cell2.00e-0858
endothelial cell of vascular tree6.43e-0724
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
vessel1.89e-0868
chest8.50e-0811
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm1.38e-0783
breast2.20e-0710
epithelial tube open at both ends3.93e-0759
blood vessel3.93e-0759
blood vasculature3.93e-0759
vascular cord3.93e-0759


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
E2F1#186934.907389214879320.008460985347239390.0325688061580545
ELF1#199734.258097958807540.01295179875054610.0462768699865988
IRF1#365937.63716375356390.002244692747297240.0128210809863263
MAX#414936.452555509007120.003721913834265510.0186746557260079
MXI1#460139.96157162875930.001011470541259020.00720874654418937
MYC#460935.22228187160940.007020843755740150.0294821237990328
USF1#739136.361499277207960.00388404057290560.019048852472115
USF2#7392312.99219738506960.0004558979393427810.00422030888911724



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.