Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3537

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:11, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3537_Basophils_CD14_CD14CD16_Peripheral_immature_Whole_amniotic



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr16:17453886..17453903,+p@chr16:17453886..17453903
+
Hg19::chr2:47300299..47300310,+p@chr2:47300299..47300310
+
Hg19::chr2:47300320..47300323,+p@chr2:47300320..47300323
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
classical monocyte5.74e-12942
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte5.74e-12942
defensive cell5.30e-11248
phagocyte5.30e-11248
monopoietic cell3.04e-8859
monocyte3.04e-8859
monoblast3.04e-8859
promonocyte3.04e-8859
myeloid leukocyte4.10e-8672
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor3.55e-8561
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell2.61e-7866
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell4.66e-7767
stuff accumulating cell9.95e-5987
myeloid cell2.49e-55108
common myeloid progenitor2.49e-55108
nongranular leukocyte6.55e-51115
leukocyte1.42e-50136
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell2.81e-40120
hematopoietic stem cell1.29e-39168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell1.29e-39168
hematopoietic cell3.06e-37177
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell7.12e-35161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell7.12e-35161
intermediate monocyte5.45e-269
CD14-positive, CD16-positive monocyte5.45e-269
basophil1.12e-163
mesenchymal cell6.20e-15354
single nucleate cell1.16e-143
mononuclear cell1.16e-143
connective tissue cell1.69e-14361
motile cell5.86e-13386
multi fate stem cell4.50e-11427
somatic stem cell8.21e-11433
stem cell1.78e-10441
circulating cell1.40e-076
non-classical monocyte3.56e-073
CD14-low, CD16-positive monocyte3.56e-073
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
bone marrow3.00e-6776
hematopoietic system1.66e-6498
blood island1.66e-6498
bone element6.84e-6282
hemolymphoid system6.21e-58108
skeletal element7.63e-5690
immune system7.68e-5493
skeletal system1.25e-49100
lateral plate mesoderm1.43e-27203
musculoskeletal system4.73e-27167
mesoderm3.67e-15315
mesoderm-derived structure3.67e-15315
presumptive mesoderm3.67e-15315
connective tissue6.68e-14371


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
EBF1#187938.9064668465690.00141523283560980.00914072369315104



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.