Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3313

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:03, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3313_Eosinophils_Basophils_CD14_Neutrophils_Peripheral_Whole_CD19



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr12:6250313..6250339,-p@chr12:6250313..6250339
-
Hg19::chr16:29168624..29168639,+p@chr16:29168624..29168639
+
Hg19::chr17:1532273..1532296,+p@chr17:1532273..1532296
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
classical monocyte1.12e-8842
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte1.12e-8842
myeloid leukocyte4.24e-8572
defensive cell5.17e-7648
phagocyte5.17e-7648
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell1.00e-6766
monopoietic cell1.72e-6759
monocyte1.72e-6759
monoblast1.72e-6759
promonocyte1.72e-6759
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell1.59e-6667
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor6.91e-6561
myeloid cell5.27e-54108
common myeloid progenitor5.27e-54108
leukocyte3.11e-47136
hematopoietic stem cell3.45e-38168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell3.45e-38168
nongranular leukocyte3.79e-37115
stuff accumulating cell2.24e-3687
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell2.88e-36120
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell1.39e-35161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell1.39e-35161
hematopoietic cell2.00e-35177
intermediate monocyte3.36e-219
CD14-positive, CD16-positive monocyte3.36e-219
granulocyte6.57e-168
blood cell3.39e-1111
mesenchymal cell1.70e-10354
connective tissue cell5.27e-10361
neutrophil5.50e-093
basophil1.26e-083
motile cell2.74e-08386
non-classical monocyte1.09e-073
CD14-low, CD16-positive monocyte1.09e-073
multi fate stem cell3.66e-07427
somatic stem cell7.30e-07433
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic system4.43e-7398
blood island4.43e-7398
hemolymphoid system3.54e-67108
bone marrow8.81e-6076
bone element1.91e-5482
immune system8.37e-5393
skeletal element1.98e-4890
skeletal system2.94e-42100
lateral plate mesoderm1.76e-29203
musculoskeletal system4.89e-20167
blood1.63e-1415
haemolymphatic fluid1.63e-1415
organism substance1.63e-1415
mesoderm4.64e-14315
mesoderm-derived structure4.64e-14315
presumptive mesoderm4.64e-14315
connective tissue2.46e-09371


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
FOS#235338.99795530889440.001372499272417130.00895554489016447



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.