Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2160

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 15:20, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2160_Neutrophils_Eosinophils_CD14_Dendritic_Peripheral_Natural_CD19



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr11:70117214..70117224,-p@chr11:70117214..70117224
-
Hg19::chr11:73087410..73087452,+p1@RELT
Hg19::chr17:63014205..63014211,-p@chr17:63014205..63014211
-
Hg19::chr1:6640110..6640130,+p2@ZBTB48


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic stem cell9.30e-65168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell9.30e-65168
hematopoietic cell6.62e-61177
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell1.77e-60161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell1.77e-60161
leukocyte7.85e-55136
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell2.27e-44120
nongranular leukocyte3.39e-44115
myeloid cell3.41e-43108
common myeloid progenitor3.41e-43108
myeloid leukocyte5.03e-3372
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell1.16e-2967
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor1.07e-2861
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell2.97e-2866
monopoietic cell1.84e-2759
monocyte1.84e-2759
monoblast1.84e-2759
promonocyte1.84e-2759
defensive cell1.71e-2648
phagocyte1.71e-2648
classical monocyte4.34e-2642
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte4.34e-2642
nucleate cell3.87e-1555
lymphocyte9.35e-1553
common lymphoid progenitor9.35e-1553
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell2.03e-1452
lymphocyte of B lineage1.82e-0824
pro-B cell1.82e-0824
motile cell1.31e-07386
mesenchymal cell1.71e-07354
intermediate monocyte3.31e-079
CD14-positive, CD16-positive monocyte3.31e-079
B cell7.58e-0714
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic system2.30e-3298
blood island2.30e-3298
hemolymphoid system1.86e-27108
bone marrow1.39e-2476
bone element1.77e-2282
immune system4.18e-2193
skeletal element1.63e-1690
skeletal system4.86e-12100
blood1.31e-0715
haemolymphatic fluid1.31e-0715
organism substance1.31e-0715
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
hematologic cancer3.40e-1151
immune system cancer3.40e-1151
leukemia1.90e-0939
myeloid leukemia1.13e-0731
organ system cancer7.37e-07137


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
BRCA1#672210.09211532161190.0137713969900260.0484641618169399



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.