Coexpression cluster:C1148

Full id: C1148_CD14_Eosinophils_Mast_Neutrophils_CD14CD16_blood_Basophils

Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr11:65186701..65186725,+	p@chr11:65186701..65186725 +
Hg19::chr18:3448314..3448333,+	p18@TGIF1
Hg19::chr19:12897222..12897231,+	p@chr19:12897222..12897231 +
Hg19::chr2:157190968..157190980,-	p@chr2:157190968..157190980 -
Hg19::chr2:28614676..28614691,+	p@chr2:28614676..28614691 +
Hg19::chr2:28614747..28614759,+	p@chr2:28614747..28614759 +
Hg19::chr8:17940787..17940819,-	p@chr8:17940787..17940819 -

Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

---

No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

---

No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>

---

Cell Type

Ontology term	p-value	n
myeloid leukocyte	6.32e-38	72
classical monocyte	5.79e-36	42
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte	5.79e-36	42
leukocyte	5.04e-35	136
defensive cell	1.01e-34	48
phagocyte	1.01e-34	48
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell	1.84e-33	67
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor	1.61e-32	61
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell	2.21e-32	66
monopoietic cell	4.98e-31	59
monocyte	4.98e-31	59
monoblast	4.98e-31	59
promonocyte	4.98e-31	59
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell	2.06e-29	120
nongranular leukocyte	3.33e-27	115
hematopoietic stem cell	2.43e-25	168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell	2.43e-25	168
hematopoietic cell	6.84e-25	177
myeloid cell	4.39e-24	108
common myeloid progenitor	4.39e-24	108
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell	1.09e-23	161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell	1.09e-23	161
stuff accumulating cell	2.61e-13	87
intermediate monocyte	9.38e-09	9
CD14-positive, CD16-positive monocyte	9.38e-09	9

Uber Anatomy

Ontology term	p-value	n
hematopoietic system	1.47e-36	98
blood island	1.47e-36	98
hemolymphoid system	1.56e-33	108
bone marrow	7.22e-31	76
bone element	2.66e-28	82
immune system	1.02e-27	93
skeletal element	3.53e-26	90
skeletal system	1.14e-21	100
lateral plate mesoderm	1.76e-18	203
musculoskeletal system	1.49e-10	167
mesoderm	1.37e-08	315
mesoderm-derived structure	1.37e-08	315
presumptive mesoderm	1.37e-08	315

Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data

---

Novel motifs

JASPAR motifs

Motifs	-log10(p-value)
{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}

ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data

---

(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF	#promoters	Enrichment	p-value	q-value
E2F1#1869	5	3.50527801062809	0.00509055358791505	0.0236858382860313
E2F6#1876	5	3.58368266549813	0.00459810189782724	0.0217245493828174
HEY1#23462	5	2.88579360221836	0.0123136694185303	0.0446227383900723
HMGN3#9324	4	4.67345584191462	0.00575188109993887	0.0259065339915696
HNF4A#3172	4	13.2184516359735	0.000109930254651323	0.00152835541340914
HNF4G#3174	3	12.3228953684772	0.00132445022199723	0.00879198224974062
MEF2C#4208	2	11.8032441407497	0.0113453818123496	0.0415973435527464
NR3C1#2908	5	10.6950166651236	2.48694675006425e-05	0.000538532514264898
NR4A1#3164	1	394.087420042644	0.00253479126469647	0.0140358976137869
SIN3A#25942	5	3.86348909058224	0.00324846567764077	0.0168286957791232
SMARCC2#6601	2	26.9015355505422	0.00228519571590825	0.0129708454007468
STAT3#6774	4	6.01112285551671	0.00225577915639448	0.0128108384619186

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data

---

This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.