Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C862

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:31, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C862_renal_Urothelial_Small_Esophageal_colon_Prostate_amniotic



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr8:134250642..134250649,-p@chr8:134250642..134250649
-
Hg19::chr8:134250840..134250883,-p@chr8:134250840..134250883
-
Hg19::chr8:134251023..134251151,-p@chr8:134251023..134251151
-
Hg19::chr8:134260979..134261020,-p6@NDRG1
Hg19::chr8:134262711..134262736,-p8@NDRG1
Hg19::chr8:134262744..134262771,-p3@NDRG1
Hg19::chr8:134269060..134269089,-p@chr8:134269060..134269089
-
Hg19::chr8:134270630..134270670,-p@chr8:134270630..134270670
-
Hg19::chr8:134276816..134276849,-p2@NDRG1
Hg19::chr8:134309488..134309503,-p1@NDRG1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
classical monocyte4.25e-1142
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte4.25e-1142
defensive cell1.52e-0948
phagocyte1.52e-0948
monopoietic cell6.23e-0759
monocyte6.23e-0759
monoblast6.23e-0759
promonocyte6.23e-0759
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor8.63e-0761
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
adult organism8.12e-14114
organ9.43e-12503
anatomical system1.39e-09624
anatomical group2.59e-09625
embryonic structure7.19e-09564
germ layer1.53e-08560
germ layer / neural crest1.53e-08560
embryonic tissue1.53e-08560
presumptive structure1.53e-08560
germ layer / neural crest derived structure1.53e-08560
epiblast (generic)1.53e-08560
multi-cellular organism1.88e-08656
developing anatomical structure6.54e-08581
embryo4.33e-07592
neural tube8.33e-0756
neural rod8.33e-0756
future spinal cord8.33e-0756
neural keel8.33e-0756


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.