Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3713

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 15:20, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3713_CD34_Basophils_CD133_Natural_CD14_Dendritic_Mast



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr18:268166..268188,+p2@AK097544
Hg19::chr3:114865016..114865037,+p@chr3:114865016..114865037
+
Hg19::chr5:43042466..43042488,-p@chr5:43042466..43042488
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
leukocyte3.34e-48136
hematopoietic stem cell1.03e-47168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell1.03e-47168
hematopoietic cell2.99e-46177
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell1.22e-41161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell1.22e-41161
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell7.52e-39120
nongranular leukocyte8.13e-38115
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell2.01e-2252
lymphocyte1.05e-2153
common lymphoid progenitor1.05e-2153
nucleate cell2.39e-2055
myeloid cell1.21e-19108
common myeloid progenitor1.21e-19108
mesenchymal cell2.06e-19354
connective tissue cell1.00e-18361
myeloid leukocyte2.28e-1872
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell3.43e-1867
motile cell4.61e-18386
classical monocyte4.68e-1742
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte4.68e-1742
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor2.60e-1561
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell3.88e-1566
defensive cell2.16e-1448
phagocyte2.16e-1448
monopoietic cell5.93e-1459
monocyte5.93e-1459
monoblast5.93e-1459
promonocyte5.93e-1459
mature alpha-beta T cell4.14e-1318
alpha-beta T cell4.14e-1318
immature T cell4.14e-1318
mature T cell4.14e-1318
immature alpha-beta T cell4.14e-1318
stem cell2.53e-11441
T cell5.17e-1125
pro-T cell5.17e-1125
somatic stem cell1.17e-10433
multi fate stem cell1.19e-10427
intermediate monocyte2.00e-109
CD14-positive, CD16-positive monocyte2.00e-109
B cell3.52e-1014
lymphocyte of B lineage6.90e-1024
pro-B cell6.90e-1024
CD8-positive, alpha-beta T cell9.15e-0911
CD4-positive, alpha-beta T cell3.55e-076
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
connective tissue1.57e-18371
bone marrow4.34e-1776
hematopoietic system1.57e-1698
blood island1.57e-1698
bone element1.82e-1682
immune system9.19e-1593
hemolymphoid system4.23e-14108
skeletal element1.54e-1390
skeletal system1.24e-10100


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
BCLAF1#9774214.43509840674790.006201147435546130.0273832665435289
ELF1#199734.258097958807540.01295179875054610.0461946899019289
YY1#752834.911170749853860.008441455341808260.032913356023412



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.