Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3332

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 15:00, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3332_leiomyoma_Fibroblast_Mallassezderived_Smooth_CD14_Osteoblast_mesenchymal



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr12:75874525..75874549,+p1@GLIPR1
Hg19::chr12:75874561..75874574,+p3@GLIPR1
Hg19::chr12:75874580..75874611,+p2@GLIPR1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
multi fate stem cell4.77e-38427
somatic stem cell1.65e-35433
stem cell7.10e-33441
somatic cell2.89e-30588
connective tissue cell3.60e-24361
mesenchymal cell1.58e-23354
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor1.14e-2261
monopoietic cell3.75e-2259
monocyte3.75e-2259
monoblast3.75e-2259
promonocyte3.75e-2259
defensive cell2.68e-2148
phagocyte2.68e-2148
myeloid leukocyte1.22e-2072
classical monocyte2.28e-1842
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte2.28e-1842
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell1.74e-1767
motile cell3.72e-17386
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell7.12e-1666
muscle precursor cell1.97e-1558
myoblast1.97e-1558
multi-potent skeletal muscle stem cell1.97e-1558
vascular associated smooth muscle cell2.61e-1432
muscle cell2.69e-1455
smooth muscle cell3.31e-1443
smooth muscle myoblast3.31e-1443
native cell7.06e-14722
leukocyte4.62e-13136
contractile cell5.15e-1359
nongranular leukocyte4.71e-12115
animal cell1.65e-11679
eukaryotic cell1.65e-11679
fibroblast5.26e-1176
electrically responsive cell7.84e-1161
electrically active cell7.84e-1161
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell2.18e-09120
stuff accumulating cell1.67e-0887
myeloid cell4.47e-08108
common myeloid progenitor4.47e-08108
mesodermal cell1.40e-07121
skin fibroblast2.43e-0723
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
musculoskeletal system4.99e-32167
mesoderm1.12e-26315
mesoderm-derived structure1.12e-26315
presumptive mesoderm1.12e-26315
lateral plate mesoderm9.34e-26203
connective tissue3.92e-24371
bone marrow4.13e-1976
hematopoietic system5.56e-1998
blood island5.56e-1998
skeletal element5.97e-1990
skeletal system2.14e-18100
bone element1.45e-1682
hemolymphoid system2.33e-16108
immune system5.48e-1593
somite7.88e-1471
presomitic mesoderm7.88e-1471
presumptive segmental plate7.88e-1471
dermomyotome7.88e-1471
trunk paraxial mesoderm7.88e-1471
artery1.12e-1342
arterial blood vessel1.12e-1342
arterial system1.12e-1342
dense mesenchyme tissue1.17e-1373
paraxial mesoderm1.79e-1372
presumptive paraxial mesoderm1.79e-1372
skeletal muscle tissue8.74e-1362
striated muscle tissue8.74e-1362
myotome8.74e-1362
multilaminar epithelium2.06e-1283
muscle tissue4.28e-1264
musculature4.28e-1264
musculature of body4.28e-1264
systemic artery1.04e-1133
systemic arterial system1.04e-1133
epithelial vesicle1.05e-1178
cardiovascular system1.25e-11109
circulatory system1.39e-10112
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm1.97e-0983
epithelial tube open at both ends3.06e-0959
blood vessel3.06e-0959
blood vasculature3.06e-0959
vascular cord3.06e-0959
vasculature5.45e-0978
vascular system5.45e-0978
tissue2.96e-07773
vessel6.44e-0768


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CEBPB#105137.971147625824820.001974187055288560.0115037729100754
ELF1#199734.258097958807540.01295179875054610.0460688273860188
EP300#203336.77394172622320.003216880500103790.0167089959989228
FOS#235338.99795530889440.001372499272417130.00895666405348491
JUN#3725312.51282919233630.0005103313992726250.00443452042671051
MEF2A#4205318.74323090964410.0001518243905622470.00194939605679007
NFKB1#479035.488063424193840.006049381815655430.0268938952598858
PAX5#507936.669565531177830.003370290999677260.0172501750411808
POU2F2#545239.106124057742520.001324165192682130.00880576176749627
SRF#6722313.79717826216780.0003806615025800190.00374243685097944
STAT3#6774310.51946499715420.0008589184530415310.0064170959523002
YY1#752834.911170749853860.008441455341808260.0328385724454543



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.