Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3234

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:55, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3234_neuroectodermal_adipose_Adipocyte_mature_skeletal_breast_colon



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr12:109592467..109592476,+p11@ACACB
Hg19::chr12:109592477..109592501,+p2@ACACB
Hg19::chr12:109592502..109592517,+p7@ACACB


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
adult organism1.19e-38114
neural tube4.58e-1756
neural rod4.58e-1756
future spinal cord4.58e-1756
neural keel4.58e-1756
regional part of nervous system2.13e-1553
regional part of brain2.13e-1553
central nervous system2.62e-1481
nervous system2.64e-1489
brain4.03e-1468
future brain4.03e-1468
regional part of forebrain9.11e-1441
forebrain9.11e-1441
anterior neural tube9.11e-1441
future forebrain9.11e-1441
neurectoderm6.41e-1386
telencephalon9.45e-1334
brain grey matter2.99e-1234
gray matter2.99e-1234
organ system subdivision3.78e-12223
neural plate7.84e-1282
presumptive neural plate7.84e-1282
regional part of telencephalon1.84e-1132
cerebral hemisphere1.97e-1132
pre-chordal neural plate2.33e-0961
neocortex3.32e-0820
regional part of cerebral cortex3.74e-0822
cerebral cortex1.33e-0725
pallium1.33e-0725
ecto-epithelium1.73e-07104


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CCNT2#90536.336201576962630.003930750035764890.0189320975366745
E2F1#186934.907389214879320.008460985347239390.0323921132214199
ELF1#199734.258097958807540.01295179875054610.0460406027810852
ESR1#2099330.76860329615453.43136389821584e-050.000674258163999556
HMGN3#932438.178547723350590.001827766942164210.0108398723266717
IRF1#365937.63716375356390.002244692747297240.0127707940205359
NANOG#79923329.24477848101273.99627955670032e-050.000734413937396138
TAF7#6879311.43306940492390.0006690181981945830.00540969275327068



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.