Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2701

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:20, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2701_acute_CD14_Dendritic_granulocyte_diffuse_CD19_biphenotypic



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr2:47205186..47205199,+p9@TTC7A
Hg19::chr2:47205250..47205266,+p6@TTC7A
Hg19::chr2:47205268..47205285,+p14@TTC7A
Hg19::chr2:47205307..47205321,+p11@TTC7A


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
monopoietic cell1.10e-8259
monocyte1.10e-8259
monoblast1.10e-8259
promonocyte1.10e-8259
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor1.79e-7961
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell4.18e-7467
myeloid leukocyte1.32e-7372
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell2.74e-7266
defensive cell6.78e-6748
phagocyte6.78e-6748
classical monocyte5.04e-6442
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte5.04e-6442
myeloid cell6.02e-63108
common myeloid progenitor6.02e-63108
nongranular leukocyte1.82e-62115
hematopoietic stem cell2.60e-60168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell2.60e-60168
leukocyte2.10e-57136
hematopoietic cell3.93e-56177
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell8.66e-55161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell8.66e-55161
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell2.53e-51120
stuff accumulating cell8.23e-3187
mesenchymal cell2.89e-17354
connective tissue cell1.59e-16361
motile cell6.27e-14386
multi fate stem cell2.35e-11427
somatic stem cell6.47e-11433
stem cell6.50e-11441
lymphocyte of B lineage5.76e-0724
pro-B cell5.76e-0724
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
bone marrow3.38e-6676
hematopoietic system2.74e-6298
blood island2.74e-6298
bone element3.59e-6082
immune system2.41e-5993
hemolymphoid system8.46e-57108
skeletal element2.21e-5390
skeletal system2.03e-46100
musculoskeletal system1.94e-22167
lateral plate mesoderm6.24e-22203
connective tissue3.53e-16371
mesoderm7.01e-09315
mesoderm-derived structure7.01e-09315
presumptive mesoderm7.01e-09315
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
hematologic cancer3.62e-0751
immune system cancer3.62e-0751


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
MAX#414946.452555509007120.0005767613195645490.00485933974298176
SPI1#668848.204323508522730.000220661881527680.00249655576263345



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.