Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2422

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:00, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2422_CD14_Mast_Eosinophils_Neutrophils_CD19_Peripheral_Alveolar



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr17:49198339..49198357,+p@chr17:49198339..49198357
+
Hg19::chr4:141016098..141016114,-p@chr4:141016098..141016114
-
Hg19::chr5:95296930..95296942,-p@chr5:95296930..95296942
-
Hg19::chr8:103801382..103801405,+p@chr8:103801382..103801405
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
classical monocyte1.15e-5442
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte1.15e-5442
myeloid leukocyte4.69e-4972
leukocyte1.96e-48136
defensive cell3.69e-4648
phagocyte3.69e-4648
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell1.83e-4367
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell6.57e-4066
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor3.28e-3961
hematopoietic stem cell7.66e-39168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell7.66e-39168
hematopoietic cell2.54e-38177
myeloid cell1.10e-37108
common myeloid progenitor1.10e-37108
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell2.52e-37120
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell4.64e-37161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell4.64e-37161
monopoietic cell1.61e-3659
monocyte1.61e-3659
monoblast1.61e-3659
promonocyte1.61e-3659
nongranular leukocyte1.50e-34115
stuff accumulating cell8.58e-2487
mesenchymal cell6.58e-13354
intermediate monocyte1.69e-129
CD14-positive, CD16-positive monocyte1.69e-129
connective tissue cell3.06e-12361
motile cell5.81e-11386
granulocyte1.35e-088
multi fate stem cell3.95e-08427
blood cell8.46e-0811
somatic stem cell9.74e-08433
stem cell1.02e-07441
circulating cell3.77e-076
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
bone marrow1.34e-3676
hematopoietic system2.54e-3498
blood island2.54e-3498
bone element7.23e-3382
hemolymphoid system6.51e-31108
skeletal element1.13e-2890
immune system1.42e-2893
skeletal system1.27e-25100
lateral plate mesoderm8.33e-13203
connective tissue7.46e-12371
musculoskeletal system2.47e-11167


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
EBF1#187936.679850134926750.005184294118278910.0240427394946239
THAP1#55145215.68457230142570.005840469678357920.0262466786892437



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.