Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2289

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 13:50, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2289_Smooth_Fibroblast_leiomyoma_Aortic_Preadipocyte_Osteoblast_mixed



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr14:23310729..23310768,+p6@MMP14
Hg19::chr14:23311185..23311202,+p@chr14:23311185..23311202
+
Hg19::chr14:23311814..23311849,+p@chr14:23311814..23311849
+
Hg19::chr14:23314522..23314538,+p@chr14:23314522..23314538
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
multilaminar epithelium9.04e-2183
epithelial vesicle1.57e-1978
somite6.99e-1971
presomitic mesoderm6.99e-1971
presumptive segmental plate6.99e-1971
dermomyotome6.99e-1971
trunk paraxial mesoderm6.99e-1971
artery1.24e-1842
arterial blood vessel1.24e-1842
arterial system1.24e-1842
dense mesenchyme tissue1.42e-1873
paraxial mesoderm3.96e-1872
presumptive paraxial mesoderm3.96e-1872
skeletal muscle tissue1.78e-1762
striated muscle tissue1.78e-1762
myotome1.78e-1762
vasculature1.84e-1778
vascular system1.84e-1778
muscle tissue4.35e-1764
musculature4.35e-1764
musculature of body4.35e-1764
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm6.12e-1783
epithelial tube open at both ends3.85e-1659
blood vessel3.85e-1659
blood vasculature3.85e-1659
vascular cord3.85e-1659
vessel6.70e-1568
systemic artery1.04e-1433
systemic arterial system1.04e-1433
unilaminar epithelium4.44e-14148
trunk mesenchyme5.92e-14122
mesoderm1.57e-12315
mesoderm-derived structure1.57e-12315
presumptive mesoderm1.57e-12315
mesenchyme2.35e-12160
entire embryonic mesenchyme2.35e-12160
epithelial tube4.50e-12117
cardiovascular system4.63e-12109
circulatory system3.90e-11112
organism subdivision4.79e-11264
trunk7.59e-10199
multi-cellular organism6.00e-09656
surface structure1.76e-0899
aorta4.07e-0821
aortic system4.07e-0821
musculoskeletal system8.88e-08167
cell layer2.35e-07309
anatomical system3.24e-07624
epithelium3.32e-07306
anatomical group4.86e-07625
smooth muscle tissue8.74e-0715
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
ovarian cancer6.59e-0714


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.