Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1301

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 11:06, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1301_CD14CD16_CD14_CD19_myeloma_Basophils_Peripheral_Monocytederived



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr10:122611224..122611295,+p2@WDR11
Hg19::chr11:60131209..60131220,+p@chr11:60131209..60131220
+
Hg19::chr11:60131239..60131261,+p@chr11:60131239..60131261
+
Hg19::chr11:63607233..63607256,-p@chr11:63607233..63607256
-
Hg19::chr14:101587625..101587634,-p@chr14:101587625..101587634
-
Hg19::chr14:23292596..23292631,-p9@SLC7A7


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0015171amino acid transmembrane transporter activity0.0149871322601806
GO:0006865amino acid transport0.0149871322601806
GO:0015837amine transport0.0149871322601806
GO:0046943carboxylic acid transmembrane transporter activity0.0149871322601806
GO:0046942carboxylic acid transport0.0149871322601806
GO:0005342organic acid transmembrane transporter activity0.0149871322601806
GO:0015849organic acid transport0.0149871322601806
GO:0006461protein complex assembly0.0450370893677146



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
leukocyte2.17e-72136
hematopoietic stem cell1.29e-67168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell1.29e-67168
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell6.62e-63161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell6.62e-63161
hematopoietic cell5.69e-62177
myeloid leukocyte1.23e-6172
nongranular leukocyte2.06e-61115
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell1.05e-60120
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell9.97e-5667
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor1.42e-5361
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell6.88e-5366
monopoietic cell2.03e-5259
monocyte2.03e-5259
monoblast2.03e-5259
promonocyte2.03e-5259
myeloid cell7.01e-51108
common myeloid progenitor7.01e-51108
defensive cell4.27e-5048
phagocyte4.27e-5048
classical monocyte4.65e-4542
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte4.65e-4542
stuff accumulating cell1.02e-1987
lymphocyte of B lineage1.40e-1924
pro-B cell1.40e-1924
mesenchymal cell4.10e-14354
B cell2.87e-1314
connective tissue cell3.66e-13361
intermediate monocyte1.07e-119
CD14-positive, CD16-positive monocyte1.07e-119
lymphocyte3.83e-1153
common lymphoid progenitor3.83e-1153
nucleate cell4.43e-1155
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell1.07e-1052
motile cell6.32e-10386
granulocyte1.03e-088
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic system9.17e-6198
blood island9.17e-6198
hemolymphoid system1.30e-55108
bone marrow1.25e-4976
immune system1.24e-4693
bone element4.08e-4482
skeletal element3.41e-3990
skeletal system5.79e-34100
lateral plate mesoderm3.21e-17203
musculoskeletal system8.20e-13167
adult organism2.00e-12114
connective tissue2.52e-12371
blood3.89e-0915
haemolymphatic fluid3.89e-0915
organism substance3.89e-0915
tissue2.10e-07773
mesoderm6.63e-07315
mesoderm-derived structure6.63e-07315
presumptive mesoderm6.63e-07315


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.