Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1104

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 10:51, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1104_heart_maxillary_teratocarcinoma_left_neuroblastoma_small_medulloblastoma



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr10:112402997..112403008,+p@chr10:112402997..112403008
+
Hg19::chr10:112404070..112404099,+p2@RBM20
Hg19::chr10:112404108..112404122,+p3@RBM20
Hg19::chr10:112404132..112404145,+p4@RBM20
Hg19::chr10:112404166..112404180,+p5@RBM20
Hg19::chr10:112523532..112523536,+p@chr10:112523532..112523536
+
Hg19::chr20:33565418..33565443,+p6@MYH7B


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
adult organism4.40e-19114
brain1.17e-1468
future brain1.17e-1468
central nervous system1.19e-1381
nervous system1.91e-1389
regional part of forebrain3.65e-1241
forebrain3.65e-1241
anterior neural tube3.65e-1241
future forebrain3.65e-1241
regional part of nervous system5.39e-1253
regional part of brain5.39e-1253
telencephalon3.62e-1134
neural tube5.44e-1156
neural rod5.44e-1156
future spinal cord5.44e-1156
neural keel5.44e-1156
cerebral hemisphere9.09e-1132
neurectoderm2.40e-1086
neural plate2.70e-1082
presumptive neural plate2.70e-1082
brain grey matter5.98e-1034
gray matter5.98e-1034
regional part of telencephalon1.32e-0932
pre-chordal neural plate5.97e-0961
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest8.17e-08132
cerebral cortex1.82e-0725
pallium1.82e-0725
ectoderm-derived structure1.98e-07171
ectoderm1.98e-07171
presumptive ectoderm1.98e-07171
anatomical cluster3.11e-07373
organ system subdivision3.38e-07223
ecto-epithelium4.03e-07104
multi-tissue structure8.31e-07342
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
lung small cell carcinoma3.67e-074


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
HMGN3#932444.673455841914620.005751881099938870.0259042997066199
SUZ12#23512535.79698636504496.40694163759818e-083.95002702295819e-06
ZBTB7A#5134144.201091033071940.00849410661287350.0324238304291628
ZNF263#1012744.698195221148960.00564122953609810.0254817858881774



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.