Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1078

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 10:48, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1078_Cardiac_Preadipocyte_Fibroblast_Chondrocyte_Synoviocyte_Ewing_Smooth



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr3:112316658..112316667,-p@chr3:112316658..112316667
-
Hg19::chr3:112357078..112357094,-p28@CCDC80
Hg19::chr3:112357126..112357147,-p16@CCDC80
Hg19::chr3:112357162..112357195,-p6@CCDC80
Hg19::chr3:112357203..112357236,-p8@CCDC80
Hg19::chr3:112357253..112357258,-p33@CCDC80
Hg19::chr3:112357353..112357363,-p29@CCDC80
Hg19::chr3:112359673..112359680,-p32@CCDC80


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
muscle tissue5.86e-1264
musculature5.86e-1264
musculature of body5.86e-1264
skeletal muscle tissue1.85e-1162
striated muscle tissue1.85e-1162
myotome1.85e-1162
dense mesenchyme tissue2.20e-1173
paraxial mesoderm6.79e-1172
presumptive paraxial mesoderm6.79e-1172
somite7.91e-1171
presomitic mesoderm7.91e-1171
presumptive segmental plate7.91e-1171
dermomyotome7.91e-1171
trunk paraxial mesoderm7.91e-1171
multilaminar epithelium5.42e-0983
epithelial vesicle8.30e-0978
heart2.83e-0824
primitive heart tube2.83e-0824
primary heart field2.83e-0824
anterior lateral plate mesoderm2.83e-0824
heart tube2.83e-0824
heart primordium2.83e-0824
cardiac mesoderm2.83e-0824
cardiogenic plate2.83e-0824
heart rudiment2.83e-0824
primary circulatory organ6.43e-0827
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm1.17e-0783
mesenchyme1.34e-07160
entire embryonic mesenchyme1.34e-07160
trunk mesenchyme2.64e-07122
blood vessel layer6.88e-077


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.