Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:1901

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 17:37, 11 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr10:62327990..62328025,-p2@Tet1
Mm9::chr10:62328027..62328038,-p6@Tet1
Mm9::chr10:62328047..62328076,-p3@Tet1
Mm9::chr10:62328079..62328093,-p5@Tet1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
neuron9.19e-1233
neuronal stem cell9.19e-1233
neuroblast9.19e-1233
electrically signaling cell9.19e-1233
electrically responsive cell9.92e-0939
electrically active cell9.92e-0939
CNS neuron (sensu Vertebrata)6.02e-0723
neuroblast (sensu Vertebrata)6.02e-0723

Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest3.47e-2392
central nervous system1.47e-2073
nervous system2.05e-1975
neurectoderm1.38e-1864
neural plate1.38e-1864
presumptive neural plate1.38e-1864
ectoderm-derived structure8.55e-1895
ectoderm8.55e-1895
presumptive ectoderm8.55e-1895
ecto-epithelium8.26e-1773
regional part of nervous system9.72e-1654
neural tube4.79e-1552
neural rod4.79e-1552
future spinal cord4.79e-1552
neural keel4.79e-1552
pre-chordal neural plate5.98e-1349
brain7.67e-1347
future brain7.67e-1347
regional part of brain2.98e-1246
anterior neural tube2.72e-1140
regional part of forebrain7.03e-1139
forebrain7.03e-1139
future forebrain7.03e-1139
gray matter3.72e-1034
tube8.73e-09114
multi-cellular organism1.81e-08333
brain grey matter4.57e-0829
regional part of telencephalon4.57e-0829
telencephalon4.57e-0829
anatomical conduit8.67e-08122
embryo1.72e-07320


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}