Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:1202

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:30, 11 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr5:131783124..131783164,-p1@Wbscr17
Mm9::chr5:131783309..131783324,-p6@Wbscr17
Mm9::chr5:131783570..131783596,-p4@Wbscr17
Mm9::chr8:59934774..59934794,+p4@Scrg1
Mm9::chr8:59934799..59934815,+p2@Scrg1
Mm9::chr8:59934817..59934833,+p3@Scrg1
Mm9::chr8:59934837..59934881,+p1@Scrg1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
nervous system1.63e-2675
central nervous system3.29e-2673
ectoderm-derived structure5.23e-2695
ectoderm5.23e-2695
presumptive ectoderm5.23e-2695
regional part of nervous system1.04e-2054
neural tube1.56e-1952
neural rod1.56e-1952
future spinal cord1.56e-1952
neural keel1.56e-1952
ecto-epithelium1.91e-1973
neurectoderm3.22e-1964
neural plate3.22e-1964
presumptive neural plate3.22e-1964
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest6.68e-1892
brain1.13e-1647
future brain1.13e-1647
gray matter1.52e-1634
regional part of brain3.23e-1646
brain grey matter5.34e-1429
regional part of telencephalon5.34e-1429
telencephalon5.34e-1429
anterior neural tube1.93e-1240
pre-chordal neural plate2.21e-1249
regional part of forebrain5.52e-1239
forebrain5.52e-1239
future forebrain5.52e-1239
cerebral cortex1.15e-1021
cerebral hemisphere1.15e-1021
pallium1.15e-1021
regional part of cerebral cortex9.43e-1017
posterior neural tube2.56e-0812
chordal neural plate2.56e-0812
multi-cellular organism8.20e-08333
occipital lobe8.49e-0710
visual cortex8.49e-0710
neocortex8.49e-0710


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}