Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3795

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:46, 12 September 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3795_lens_Olfactory_mesenchymal_leiomyoma_Fibroblast_mesothelioma_papillary



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr19:41727090..41727118,+p@chr19:41727090..41727118
+
Hg19::chr19:41727775..41727794,+p@chr19:41727775..41727794
+
Hg19::chr19:41727873..41727889,+p@chr19:41727873..41727889
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
trunk mesenchyme1.64e-18143
organism subdivision3.30e-17365
somite9.36e-1783
paraxial mesoderm9.36e-1783
presomitic mesoderm9.36e-1783
presumptive segmental plate9.36e-1783
trunk paraxial mesoderm9.36e-1783
presumptive paraxial mesoderm9.36e-1783
multi-tissue structure1.31e-16347
cell layer4.14e-15312
epithelium2.04e-14309
trunk3.34e-14216
epithelial tube4.28e-14118
multi-cellular organism1.37e-13659
dermomyotome3.36e-1370
vasculature3.52e-1379
vascular system3.52e-1379
multilaminar epithelium4.90e-1382
anatomical cluster1.26e-12286
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm2.02e-1284
blood vessel2.04e-1260
epithelial tube open at both ends2.04e-1260
blood vasculature2.04e-1260
vascular cord2.04e-1260
mesenchyme3.42e-12238
entire embryonic mesenchyme3.42e-12238
artery6.82e-1242
arterial blood vessel6.82e-1242
arterial system6.82e-1242
unilaminar epithelium2.22e-11138
vessel2.59e-1169
anatomical system3.43e-11625
anatomical group5.98e-11626
surface structure6.36e-1195
skeletal muscle tissue4.94e-1061
striated muscle tissue4.94e-1061
myotome4.94e-1061
muscle tissue6.61e-1063
musculature6.61e-1063
musculature of body6.61e-1063
systemic artery2.31e-0933
systemic arterial system2.31e-0933
anatomical conduit7.95e-09241
embryo2.57e-08612
organ part4.26e-08219
embryonic structure6.53e-08605
developing anatomical structure6.53e-08605
germ layer8.43e-08604
embryonic tissue8.43e-08604
presumptive structure8.43e-08604
epiblast (generic)8.43e-08604
cardiovascular system1.12e-07110
circulatory system2.28e-07113
tube4.75e-07194
integument8.52e-0745
integumental system8.52e-0745


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.