Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3537

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:28, 12 September 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3537_Basophils_CD14_CD14CD16_Peripheral_immature_Whole_amniotic



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr16:17453886..17453903,+p@chr16:17453886..17453903
+
Hg19::chr2:47300299..47300310,+p@chr2:47300299..47300310
+
Hg19::chr2:47300320..47300323,+p@chr2:47300320..47300323
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte7.95e-9242
classical monocyte6.88e-8545
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor2.98e-6965
monopoietic cell4.42e-6563
monocyte4.42e-6563
monoblast4.42e-6563
promonocyte4.42e-6563
myeloid leukocyte6.52e-6476
leukocyte1.22e-63140
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell2.24e-6271
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell2.09e-5770
hematopoietic stem cell5.13e-56172
angioblastic mesenchymal cell5.13e-56172
myeloid cell7.08e-56112
common myeloid progenitor7.08e-56112
nongranular leukocyte8.27e-53119
hematopoietic cell5.18e-52182
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell2.40e-49165
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell2.40e-49165
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell5.84e-48124
mesenchymal cell7.21e-20358
connective tissue cell3.72e-19365
intermediate monocyte3.36e-189
CD14-positive, CD16-positive monocyte3.36e-189
motile cell1.20e-16390
multi fate stem cell2.30e-14430
stem cell4.30e-14444
somatic stem cell6.29e-14436
dendritic cell1.87e-1210
conventional dendritic cell5.74e-128
Langerhans cell6.84e-125
basophil2.37e-093
non-classical monocyte1.79e-083
CD14-low, CD16-positive monocyte1.79e-083
mononuclear cell3.52e-083
natural killer cell1.81e-073
pro-NK cell1.81e-073
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
bone marrow1.44e-5680
hematopoietic system5.05e-55102
blood island5.05e-55102
bone element9.62e-5286
hemolymphoid system7.27e-49112
skeletal element3.53e-42101
skeletal system3.53e-42101
immune system3.41e-37115
musculoskeletal system1.15e-21167
lateral plate mesoderm1.08e-20216
connective tissue3.48e-18375


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
EBF1#187938.9064668465690.00141523283560980.00914072369315104



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.