Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1725

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:19, 12 September 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1725_Neutrophils_Eosinophils_Mast_CD8_Natural_CD4_cord



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr14:45431091..45431175,-p1@KLHL28
Hg19::chr3:39093481..39093520,+p1@WDR48
Hg19::chr4:4291944..4292011,+p1@ZBTB49
Hg19::chr6:42750549..42750592,-p@chr6:42750549..42750592
-
Hg19::chr9:32550839..32550962,-p3@TOPORS


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0017033DNA topoisomerase I binding0.0054750971388202
GO:0051457maintenance of protein localization in nucleus0.0136861311971243
GO:0032507maintenance of cellular protein localization0.0284495579902943
GO:0051651maintenance of cellular localization0.0284495579902943
GO:0045185maintenance of protein localization0.0284495579902943
GO:0051235maintenance of localization0.0373691275791586



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
leukocyte1.92e-30140
hematopoietic stem cell3.00e-24172
angioblastic mesenchymal cell3.00e-24172
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell2.36e-22124
hematopoietic cell5.24e-22182
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell3.08e-21165
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell3.08e-21165
nongranular leukocyte1.20e-20119
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell4.22e-1552
lymphocyte6.57e-1553
common lymphoid progenitor6.57e-1553
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte9.02e-1342
myeloid leukocyte2.13e-1176
classical monocyte3.11e-1145
mature alpha-beta T cell4.08e-1118
alpha-beta T cell4.08e-1118
immature T cell4.08e-1118
mature T cell4.08e-1118
immature alpha-beta T cell4.08e-1118
T cell9.38e-1025
pro-T cell9.38e-1025
myeloid cell1.84e-08112
common myeloid progenitor1.84e-08112
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell2.87e-0871
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell3.02e-0870
CD8-positive, alpha-beta T cell6.85e-0811
B cell8.89e-0714
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
adult organism4.32e-22115
central nervous system1.35e-1682
neural tube1.02e-1557
neural rod1.02e-1557
future spinal cord1.02e-1557
neural keel1.02e-1557
regional part of nervous system5.78e-1594
nervous system5.78e-1594
regional part of forebrain8.04e-1541
forebrain8.04e-1541
future forebrain8.04e-1541
anterior neural tube1.48e-1442
hematopoietic system2.85e-13102
blood island2.85e-13102
regional part of brain3.58e-1359
brain5.98e-1369
future brain5.98e-1369
telencephalon1.69e-1234
gray matter2.11e-1234
brain grey matter2.11e-1234
regional part of telencephalon3.85e-1233
cerebral hemisphere6.28e-1232
hemolymphoid system2.45e-11112
regional part of cerebral cortex1.06e-0922
cerebral cortex2.13e-0925
pallium2.13e-0925
neocortex5.52e-0920
blood1.09e-0815
haemolymphatic fluid1.09e-0815
organism substance1.09e-0815
neurectoderm1.36e-0890
neural plate3.32e-0886
presumptive neural plate3.32e-0886
pre-chordal neural plate1.49e-0761
bone marrow8.96e-0780
bone element9.93e-0786


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CHD2#110636.206413700470110.007774550126275590.0319520793577088
E2F1#186954.907389214879320.0003512818099256460.00352561223782669
HEY1#2346254.040111043105710.0009288852205177990.00674021007056614
HNF4G#3174211.50136901057870.01127438304921050.0413747950130536
NANOG#79923211.69791139240510.01091164951956080.0402174535634321
NFKB1#479044.390450739355070.004707732692524960.0222023434036854
NR2C2#7182319.56876654314450.0002750171700966610.00293057016913837
SIN3A#2594244.327107781452110.004977052855762880.0232405626040874
SP2#6668210.46141219753790.01353191183347140.0477775300870831
TAF1#687253.343046285745290.002394600090870310.0135278649261862
TBP#690853.706770687096390.001428755106721120.00918376136083501
YY1#752843.928936599883080.007193866269917620.0298379745577413



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.