Coexpression cluster:C1319

Full id: C1319_skeletal_mesodermal_sacrococcigeal_mature_astrocytoma_lung_adipose

Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr10:63808979..63808990,+	p8@ARID5B
Hg19::chr10:63809013..63809041,+	p3@ARID5B
Hg19::chr10:63809077..63809089,+	p5@ARID5B
Hg19::chr10:63809090..63809097,+	p7@ARID5B
Hg19::chr10:63809106..63809127,+	p1@ARID5B
Hg19::chr10:63809134..63809145,+	p6@ARID5B

Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

---

No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

---

No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>

---

Cell Type

Ontology term	p-value	n
non-terminally differentiated cell	2.08e-13	180
fibroblast	2.20e-10	75

Uber Anatomy

Ontology term	p-value	n
adult organism	4.80e-13	115
organism subdivision	1.02e-08	365
somite	3.12e-07	83
paraxial mesoderm	3.12e-07	83
presomitic mesoderm	3.12e-07	83
presumptive segmental plate	3.12e-07	83
trunk paraxial mesoderm	3.12e-07	83
presumptive paraxial mesoderm	3.12e-07	83
muscle tissue	3.44e-07	63
musculature	3.44e-07	63
musculature of body	3.44e-07	63
skeletal muscle tissue	7.61e-07	61
striated muscle tissue	7.61e-07	61
myotome	7.61e-07	61

Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data

---

Novel motifs

JASPAR motifs

Motifs	-log10(p-value)
{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}

ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data

---

(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF	#promoters	Enrichment	p-value	q-value
E2F6#1876	6	5.01715573169739	6.26776799983417e-05	0.00102441224121233
EP300#2033	6	6.7739417262232	1.03454107484288e-05	0.000269375306196747
FOS#2353	6	8.9979553088944	1.88302066097805e-06	6.93688870588665e-05
FOSL2#2355	6	16.9302006045617	4.24097585093121e-08	2.78918940110456e-06
FOXA1#3169	6	11.0814197493855	5.39600313513231e-07	2.5035680649937e-05
FOXA2#3170	6	24.6304637526652	4.47024549595265e-09	3.6163281901766e-07
HEY1#23462	6	4.04011104310571	0.000229896855580751	0.0025289864862016
JUND#3727	6	6.99466394187103	8.53468650061654e-06	0.000232063036562846
MAX#4149	6	6.45255550900712	1.3848964723355e-05	0.000334343972894701
MYC#4609	6	5.2222818716094	4.92821127172503e-05	0.000853278277532644
NANOG#79923	6	29.2447784810127	1.59482916286439e-09	1.40204009209086e-07
NR3C1#2908	6	14.973023331173	8.86442195171695e-08	5.24230670563628e-06
POLR2A#5430	6	2.14745317655807	0.0101957067681878	0.0379875644523123
RAD21#5885	6	10.3550338954563	8.10515055094479e-07	3.53885375581155e-05
REST#5978	6	9.65002871612802	1.23743801704917e-06	4.98598723235334e-05
SIN3A#25942	6	5.40888472681514	3.99207083571449e-05	0.000741996593719853
SP1#6667	6	5.6983813781409	2.91961319085282e-05	0.000608868774040491
TAF1#6872	6	3.34304628574529	0.000716247428463562	0.00572466252248458
TBP#6908	6	3.70677068709639	0.00038541647290796	0.00377461656170616
TCF7L2#6934	6	10.7701765631373	6.40204410218762e-07	2.91085365253971e-05
TRIM28#10155	6	18.5905250452625	2.41896703530258e-08	1.69212657870038e-06
USF1#7391	6	6.36149927720796	1.50818327938273e-05	0.000356929874270231
USF2#7392	6	12.9921973850696	2.07721573629339e-07	1.11309560945482e-05
YY1#7528	6	4.91117074985386	7.12445972864136e-05	0.00112329627053076
ZNF263#10127	6	8.22184163701068	3.23542093046082e-06	0.000108650844551896

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data

---

This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.