Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2691

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 13:55, 5 September 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2691_migratory_CD14_splenic_myelodysplastic_immature_acute_Dendritic



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr2:232047395..232047400,-p@chr2:232047395..232047400
-
Hg19::chr2:232047415..232047450,-p@chr2:232047415..232047450
-
Hg19::chr2:232047454..232047457,-p@chr2:232047454..232047457
-
Hg19::chr9:134610968..134610980,-p@chr9:134610968..134610980
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
myeloid cell2.35e-52112
common myeloid progenitor2.35e-52112
myeloid leukocyte3.69e-4876
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor4.64e-4565
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell3.05e-4371
monopoietic cell1.72e-4263
monocyte1.72e-4263
monoblast1.72e-4263
promonocyte1.72e-4263
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell6.69e-4070
hematopoietic stem cell1.00e-37172
angioblastic mesenchymal cell1.00e-37172
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell5.95e-37165
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell5.95e-37165
leukocyte1.71e-35140
hematopoietic cell4.33e-34182
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte1.32e-3042
classical monocyte1.00e-2745
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell1.12e-25124
nongranular leukocyte5.46e-25119
conventional dendritic cell4.52e-138
dendritic cell2.25e-1210
mesenchymal cell1.25e-11358
connective tissue cell2.51e-11365
motile cell3.79e-09390
immature conventional dendritic cell7.47e-095
common dendritic progenitor7.47e-095
Langerhans cell1.64e-085
multi fate stem cell5.71e-08430
granulocyte1.35e-078
somatic stem cell1.65e-07436
stem cell2.66e-07444
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
bone marrow3.07e-3680
bone element2.11e-3286
hematopoietic system1.32e-30102
blood island1.32e-30102
immune system4.16e-30115
hemolymphoid system1.90e-28112
skeletal element7.20e-25101
skeletal system7.20e-25101
musculoskeletal system3.17e-13167
connective tissue2.90e-11375
lateral plate mesoderm1.99e-08216


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
FOS#235348.99795530889440.0001525147711168630.00195106445133195
MAX#414934.839416631755340.01315737137836840.0466380229902733
NFYA#4800313.81918552487290.0006132411806734510.00508909778850652
NFYB#4801312.56984494015230.000811456397697350.00619138623020993
USF1#739146.361499277207960.0006105011399140830.00508494525492359
USF2#739239.74414803880220.001718341848410070.010723746896092



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.