Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4413

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 13:32, 5 September 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4413_Preadipocyte_optic_globus_thalamus_somatostatinoma_spinal_substantia



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr4:41362776..41362792,+p2@LIMCH1
Hg19::chr4:41362796..41362841,+p1@LIMCH1
Hg19::chr4:41362846..41362859,+p5@LIMCH1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
adult organism1.29e-32115
anatomical cluster7.23e-28286
anatomical conduit9.46e-28241
neural tube1.44e-2757
neural rod1.44e-2757
future spinal cord1.44e-2757
neural keel1.44e-2757
tube6.82e-27194
regional part of nervous system6.88e-2594
nervous system6.88e-2594
central nervous system3.55e-2482
brain6.56e-2369
future brain6.56e-2369
neural plate1.35e-2286
presumptive neural plate1.35e-2286
anterior neural tube1.76e-2242
regional part of forebrain3.94e-2241
forebrain3.94e-2241
future forebrain3.94e-2241
neurectoderm5.83e-2290
regional part of brain1.07e-2159
organism subdivision2.75e-20365
gray matter1.26e-1934
brain grey matter1.26e-1934
telencephalon1.38e-1934
regional part of telencephalon5.50e-1933
epithelium2.10e-18309
cerebral hemisphere3.19e-1832
multi-cellular organism5.20e-18659
cell layer2.59e-17312
multi-tissue structure5.38e-17347
pre-chordal neural plate2.34e-1661
anatomical system8.89e-15625
anatomical group1.74e-14626
cerebral cortex3.22e-1425
pallium3.22e-1425
organ part3.80e-14219
head8.87e-14123
anterior region of body1.42e-13129
craniocervical region1.42e-13129
regional part of cerebral cortex2.32e-1322
ectoderm-derived structure4.51e-13169
ectoderm5.61e-13173
presumptive ectoderm5.61e-13173
neocortex3.48e-1220
organ5.32e-11511
embryo1.25e-10612
embryonic structure5.74e-10605
developing anatomical structure5.74e-10605
germ layer8.46e-10604
embryonic tissue8.46e-10604
presumptive structure8.46e-10604
epiblast (generic)8.46e-10604
nucleus of brain6.57e-079
neural nucleus6.57e-079
basal ganglion8.72e-079
nuclear complex of neuraxis8.72e-079
aggregate regional part of brain8.72e-079
collection of basal ganglia8.72e-079
cerebral subcortex8.72e-079
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
cell type cancer3.46e-07143


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
E2F1#186934.907389214879320.008460985347239390.0326929168182446
ZNF263#1012738.221841637010680.001799043925565870.0109819597020384



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.