Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4104

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 12:55, 5 September 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4104_pineal_parietal_pituitary_testis_caudate_spinal_thalamus



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr22:42720402..42720435,-p@chr22:42720402..42720435
-
Hg19::chr7:124569919..124569936,+p1@ENST00000429134
Hg19::chr7:124569941..124569993,+p1@ENST00000435452
p1@ENST00000449642
p1@ENST00000453342
p1@uc003vlp.2
p1@uc003vlq.1
p1@uc010lkx.1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
regional part of nervous system4.63e-3494
nervous system4.63e-3494
central nervous system1.19e-3282
neural tube5.05e-3257
neural rod5.05e-3257
future spinal cord5.05e-3257
neural keel5.05e-3257
adult organism2.47e-30115
neurectoderm9.50e-2990
brain8.16e-2869
future brain8.16e-2869
regional part of brain1.03e-2759
neural plate8.53e-2786
presumptive neural plate8.53e-2786
regional part of forebrain1.27e-2641
forebrain1.27e-2641
future forebrain1.27e-2641
anterior neural tube6.62e-2642
pre-chordal neural plate9.28e-2361
gray matter5.59e-2234
brain grey matter5.59e-2234
telencephalon5.85e-2234
regional part of telencephalon2.23e-2133
cerebral hemisphere1.22e-2032
anterior region of body1.35e-19129
craniocervical region1.35e-19129
ectoderm1.13e-18173
presumptive ectoderm1.13e-18173
head6.96e-18123
ectoderm-derived structure3.63e-17169
cerebral cortex3.92e-1625
pallium3.92e-1625
regional part of cerebral cortex5.99e-1522
neocortex9.66e-1420
posterior neural tube2.24e-0715
chordal neural plate2.24e-0715
nucleus of brain2.57e-079
neural nucleus2.57e-079
basal ganglion2.91e-079
nuclear complex of neuraxis2.91e-079
aggregate regional part of brain2.91e-079
collection of basal ganglia2.91e-079
cerebral subcortex2.91e-079
organ part6.32e-07219


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
ATF3#467214.97544968400580.005768294540793880.0259614270004728
BRCA1#672213.45615376214920.007119807716084560.0296308267806398
HNF4A#3172215.42152690863580.005444210486686610.0246782942282579
HNF4G#3174219.16894835096450.003543986611284220.017975349312608
NANOG#79923219.49651898734180.003427255648501020.0174527842739187
SETDB1#9869226.8800174520070.001814468907964410.010895263512844
STAT1#6772213.80439166479950.006770931708444080.028756428640486
STAT2#6773243.50918079096040.0006968990898868230.00560908169302481
TRIM28#10155212.39368336350830.008368344129438470.0329208035458198



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.