Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C656

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 12:46, 5 September 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C656_CD14_immature_Dendritic_Basophils_CD34_CD133_CD19



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr11:64039133..64039136,+p@chr11:64039133..64039136
+
Hg19::chr12:111844666..111844678,-p@chr12:111844666..111844678
-
Hg19::chr18:13217774..13217781,-p@chr18:13217774..13217781
-
Hg19::chr2:202021629..202021643,+p@chr2:202021629..202021643
+
Hg19::chr3:170074447..170074452,+p@chr3:170074447..170074452
+
Hg19::chr3:195633911..195633922,+p@chr3:195633911..195633922
+
Hg19::chr3:4793475..4793490,+p@chr3:4793475..4793490
+
Hg19::chr4:15657351..15657354,+p@chr4:15657351..15657354
+
Hg19::chr5:98269499..98269504,+p@chr5:98269499..98269504
+
Hg19::chr6:291825..291875,+p6@DUSP22
Hg19::chr7:108165902..108165905,+p@chr7:108165902..108165905
+
Hg19::chr9:134604636..134604648,-p@chr9:134604636..134604648
-
Hg19::chr9:80786687..80786703,-p@chr9:80786687..80786703
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
leukocyte2.13e-41140
hematopoietic stem cell3.67e-36172
angioblastic mesenchymal cell3.67e-36172
nongranular leukocyte1.82e-34119
hematopoietic cell3.55e-34182
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell1.82e-32165
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell1.82e-32165
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell2.50e-32124
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte2.09e-2342
classical monocyte5.09e-2045
lymphocyte2.61e-1853
common lymphoid progenitor2.61e-1853
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell6.74e-1852
myeloid leukocyte1.26e-1676
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell5.94e-1671
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor1.60e-1565
myeloid cell8.99e-15112
common myeloid progenitor8.99e-15112
monopoietic cell2.19e-1463
monocyte2.19e-1463
monoblast2.19e-1463
promonocyte2.19e-1463
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell1.60e-1370
mesenchymal cell1.26e-12358
motile cell3.61e-12390
connective tissue cell5.74e-12365
lymphocyte of B lineage1.35e-1024
pro-B cell1.35e-1024
B cell2.06e-0814
multi fate stem cell1.19e-07430
stem cell1.41e-07444
somatic stem cell1.96e-07436
intermediate monocyte3.15e-079
CD14-positive, CD16-positive monocyte3.15e-079
T cell4.17e-0725
pro-T cell4.17e-0725
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
bone marrow6.27e-1680
hematopoietic system1.38e-14102
blood island1.38e-14102
bone element6.69e-1486
connective tissue1.87e-12375
hemolymphoid system1.53e-11112
skeletal element2.01e-11101
skeletal system2.01e-11101
immune system2.38e-07115


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
BCL11A#5333536.546797331601630.009600332311689340.0361341035858629
BCL3#60237.972408339324230.005575358717057480.025227888265273
EBF1#187964.110677006108770.0017009226757290.0106239258017141
SPI1#668863.786610850087410.002614000338510870.0144522806433953



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.