Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1797

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 12:13, 5 September 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1797_optic_vagina_paracentral_parietal_mature_frontal_occipital



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr18:21851643..21851662,-p5@OSBPL1A
Hg19::chr18:21851868..21851939,-p4@OSBPL1A
Hg19::chr18:21851955..21851971,-p7@OSBPL1A
Hg19::chr18:21851975..21851992,-p6@OSBPL1A
Hg19::chr18:21852143..21852205,-p2@OSBPL1A


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
adult organism6.50e-38115
ectoderm-derived structure1.76e-28169
organism subdivision2.70e-28365
head2.72e-27123
ectoderm5.97e-27173
presumptive ectoderm5.97e-27173
organ4.05e-26511
anterior region of body7.97e-26129
craniocervical region7.97e-26129
multi-tissue structure8.20e-26347
neural tube1.02e-2557
neural rod1.02e-2557
future spinal cord1.02e-2557
neural keel1.02e-2557
neural plate1.25e-2586
presumptive neural plate1.25e-2586
multi-cellular organism2.44e-25659
regional part of brain6.11e-2459
neurectoderm2.18e-2390
brain2.76e-2369
future brain2.76e-2369
anatomical system1.62e-22625
regional part of nervous system2.56e-2294
nervous system2.56e-2294
anatomical group4.28e-22626
central nervous system4.48e-2282
embryo3.76e-21612
anterior neural tube4.49e-2142
regional part of forebrain1.85e-2041
forebrain1.85e-2041
future forebrain1.85e-2041
embryonic structure3.65e-20605
developing anatomical structure3.65e-20605
germ layer1.02e-19604
embryonic tissue1.02e-19604
presumptive structure1.02e-19604
epiblast (generic)1.02e-19604
pre-chordal neural plate2.91e-1861
telencephalon2.64e-1734
organ part2.77e-17219
gray matter3.62e-1734
brain grey matter3.62e-1734
regional part of telencephalon1.26e-1633
cerebral hemisphere4.30e-1632
anatomical cluster7.68e-15286
cell layer3.56e-14312
regional part of cerebral cortex4.14e-1422
epithelium6.01e-14309
neocortex5.09e-1320
cerebral cortex2.77e-1225
pallium2.77e-1225
anatomical conduit1.31e-11241
endoderm-derived structure9.33e-08169
endoderm9.33e-08169
presumptive endoderm9.33e-08169
tube1.40e-07194
orifice2.67e-0735
digestive system2.89e-07155
digestive tract2.89e-07155
primitive gut2.89e-07155


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CTCF#1066444.288205098460020.005152015588243280.0239355585418389
E2F1#186954.907389214879320.0003512818099256460.00352764624488697
RAD21#588548.284027116365060.0004011622639122450.00386681916758015
SP1#666744.558705102512720.00407573565781680.0194857292912213
TAF1#687253.343046285745290.002394600090870310.013535918970037
TBP#690853.706770687096390.001428755106721120.0091882853812098
ZNF263#1012746.577473309608540.0009875103237900160.00709218750559108



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.