Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1790

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 12:13, 5 September 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1790_parotid_salivary_Osteoblast_mesenchymal_Smooth_Synoviocyte_submaxillary



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr17:66597246..66597255,-p7@FAM20A
Hg19::chr17:66597316..66597327,-p6@FAM20A
Hg19::chr17:66597345..66597366,-p5@FAM20A
Hg19::chr17:66597372..66597404,-p3@FAM20A
Hg19::chr17:66597406..66597423,-p4@FAM20A


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
fibroblast4.21e-0875
preadipocyte4.45e-0712
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte7.55e-0742
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
adult organism4.78e-14115
multi-cellular organism9.94e-14659
organ2.37e-13511
anatomical system3.11e-10625
anatomical group4.58e-10626
embryo2.66e-08612
mesoderm4.33e-08448
mesoderm-derived structure4.33e-08448
presumptive mesoderm4.33e-08448
musculoskeletal system2.01e-07167
immune system2.54e-07115
gonad2.55e-0721
indifferent external genitalia2.55e-0721
indifferent gonad2.55e-0721
gonad primordium2.55e-0721
tissue4.51e-07787
embryonic structure8.85e-07605
developing anatomical structure8.85e-07605


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
HEY1#2346254.040111043105710.0009288852205177990.00674208378244898
SIN3A#2594255.408884726815140.0002159522671657270.00248089746238273
TAF1#687253.343046285745290.002394600090870310.0135351863879636
ZNF263#1012758.221841637010682.6606316672286e-050.00057093427305052



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.