Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2410

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 11:35, 5 September 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2410_medial_amygdala_brain_smallcell_putamen_cerebellum_parietal



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr17:42390503..42390533,+p@chr17:42390503..42390533
+
Hg19::chr19:55686309..55686319,-p@chr19:55686309..55686319
-
Hg19::chr1:110738238..110738245,+p5@SLC6A17
Hg19::chr1:110740082..110740093,+p@chr1:110740082..110740093
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
central nervous system5.00e-4682
neural tube1.61e-4557
neural rod1.61e-4557
future spinal cord1.61e-4557
neural keel1.61e-4557
regional part of nervous system1.60e-4394
nervous system1.60e-4394
regional part of brain4.87e-4159
regional part of forebrain1.53e-3941
forebrain1.53e-3941
future forebrain1.53e-3941
anterior neural tube2.58e-3842
brain9.13e-3869
future brain9.13e-3869
gray matter5.40e-3634
brain grey matter5.40e-3634
telencephalon7.84e-3634
regional part of telencephalon2.35e-3433
cerebral hemisphere7.94e-3432
adult organism8.47e-32115
neural plate9.07e-3286
presumptive neural plate9.07e-3286
regional part of cerebral cortex1.94e-3122
neurectoderm5.16e-3190
neocortex1.59e-2820
pre-chordal neural plate5.82e-2761
cerebral cortex7.36e-2725
pallium7.36e-2725
ectoderm-derived structure4.91e-21169
ectoderm5.84e-21173
presumptive ectoderm5.84e-21173
head4.47e-19123
anterior region of body2.91e-18129
craniocervical region2.91e-18129
basal ganglion8.59e-119
nuclear complex of neuraxis8.59e-119
aggregate regional part of brain8.59e-119
collection of basal ganglia8.59e-119
cerebral subcortex8.59e-119
gyrus1.39e-106
nucleus of brain1.77e-109
neural nucleus1.77e-109
tube1.95e-10194
temporal lobe3.33e-107
parietal lobe7.38e-095
limbic system7.73e-095
posterior neural tube1.16e-0815
chordal neural plate1.16e-0815
brainstem1.71e-088
occipital lobe2.03e-085
telencephalic nucleus6.24e-087
corpus striatum2.02e-074
striatum2.02e-074
ventral part of telencephalon2.02e-074
future corpus striatum2.02e-074
segmental subdivision of hindbrain2.87e-0712
hindbrain2.87e-0712
presumptive hindbrain2.87e-0712
anatomical conduit4.10e-07241


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
HNF4A#3172211.56614518147680.01057585681762490.0390694319329323
HNF4G#3174214.37671126322340.006924169980439180.0293047529516184



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.