Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1512

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 17:22, 8 August 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1512_Smooth_hepatic_mesenchymal_Mallassezderived_Small_Gingival_Ewing



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr3:145788942..145788958,-p7@PLOD2
Hg19::chr3:145789101..145789120,-p5@PLOD2
Hg19::chr3:145824416..145824437,-p@chr3:145824416..145824437
-
Hg19::chr3:145838965..145839010,+p@chr3:145838965..145839010
+
Hg19::chr3:145878962..145878979,-p1@PLOD2
Hg19::chr3:145879113..145879126,-p2@PLOD2


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
unilaminar epithelium2.24e-21138
vasculature4.07e-2079
vascular system4.07e-2079
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm3.17e-1984
blood vessel1.03e-1860
epithelial tube open at both ends1.03e-1860
blood vasculature1.03e-1860
vascular cord1.03e-1860
epithelial tube1.34e-18118
vessel1.50e-1869
somite1.78e-1883
paraxial mesoderm1.78e-1883
presomitic mesoderm1.78e-1883
presumptive segmental plate1.78e-1883
trunk paraxial mesoderm1.78e-1883
presumptive paraxial mesoderm1.78e-1883
trunk mesenchyme2.60e-18143
artery3.49e-1842
arterial blood vessel3.49e-1842
arterial system3.49e-1842
trunk2.20e-16216
skeletal muscle tissue3.30e-1661
striated muscle tissue3.30e-1661
myotome3.30e-1661
multilaminar epithelium3.43e-1682
dermomyotome4.98e-1670
muscle tissue5.72e-1663
musculature5.72e-1663
musculature of body5.72e-1663
systemic artery1.84e-1533
systemic arterial system1.84e-1533
cardiovascular system5.84e-15110
circulatory system1.24e-14113
anatomical cluster1.48e-14286
organism subdivision2.08e-14365
multi-tissue structure2.61e-14347
epithelium9.03e-14309
cell layer9.75e-14312
mesenchyme1.71e-13238
entire embryonic mesenchyme1.71e-13238
multi-cellular organism2.79e-13659
anatomical conduit4.05e-11241
anatomical system4.58e-10625
anatomical group8.80e-10626
tube3.36e-09194
aorta4.81e-0921
aortic system4.81e-0921
smooth muscle tissue5.84e-0715
blood vessel smooth muscle7.71e-0710
arterial system smooth muscle7.71e-0710
artery smooth muscle tissue7.71e-0710
aorta smooth muscle tissue7.71e-0710
embryo8.67e-07612
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
ovarian cancer2.72e-0814


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.