Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4329

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:47, 21 May 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4329_mesenchymal_epithelioid_meningioma_Smooth_embryonic_Bronchial_Gingival



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr3:45187813..45187824,-p3@CDCP1
Hg19::chr3:45187843..45187907,-p1@CDCP1
Hg19::chr3:45187930..45187949,-p2@CDCP1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
mesenchyme2.96e-19238
entire embryonic mesenchyme2.96e-19238
multi-tissue structure1.04e-18347
multilaminar epithelium1.69e-1682
anatomical system3.67e-16625
trunk mesenchyme4.07e-16143
embryo7.00e-16612
anatomical group7.72e-16626
embryonic structure2.88e-15605
developing anatomical structure2.88e-15605
germ layer4.18e-15604
embryonic tissue4.18e-15604
presumptive structure4.18e-15604
epiblast (generic)4.18e-15604
trunk9.78e-15216
endoderm-derived structure2.36e-14169
endoderm2.36e-14169
presumptive endoderm2.36e-14169
epithelium4.34e-14309
dermomyotome5.37e-1470
cell layer6.19e-14312
multi-cellular organism2.47e-13659
somite4.28e-1383
paraxial mesoderm4.28e-1383
presomitic mesoderm4.28e-1383
presumptive segmental plate4.28e-1383
trunk paraxial mesoderm4.28e-1383
presumptive paraxial mesoderm4.28e-1383
anatomical space1.14e-12104
mesoderm3.01e-12448
mesoderm-derived structure3.01e-12448
presumptive mesoderm3.01e-12448
artery3.89e-1242
arterial blood vessel3.89e-1242
arterial system3.89e-1242
skeletal muscle tissue3.93e-1261
striated muscle tissue3.93e-1261
myotome3.93e-1261
muscle tissue6.05e-1263
musculature6.05e-1263
musculature of body6.05e-1263
digestive system1.36e-11155
digestive tract1.36e-11155
primitive gut1.36e-11155
systemic artery1.46e-1133
systemic arterial system1.46e-1133
unilaminar epithelium2.13e-11138
primordium3.59e-11168
immaterial anatomical entity3.75e-10126
epithelial tube2.12e-09118
organism subdivision5.23e-09365
organ6.41e-09511
subdivision of digestive tract1.26e-08129
endodermal part of digestive tract1.26e-08129
reproductive structure5.44e-0859
reproductive system5.44e-0859
respiratory system8.53e-0872
anatomical cavity8.67e-0870
blood vessel1.22e-0760
epithelial tube open at both ends1.22e-0760
blood vasculature1.22e-0760
vascular cord1.22e-0760
body cavity precursor1.66e-0763
female organism2.72e-0741
blood vessel smooth muscle2.90e-0710
arterial system smooth muscle2.90e-0710
artery smooth muscle tissue2.90e-0710
aorta smooth muscle tissue2.90e-0710
epithelial bud4.93e-0737
smooth muscle tissue6.38e-0715
duct9.22e-0726
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
reproductive organ cancer1.35e-1129
female reproductive organ cancer3.53e-1127
ovarian cancer1.01e-0914
carcinoma3.42e-09106


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.