Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3917

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:42, 21 May 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3917_pineal_thalamus_globus_spinal_substantia_caudate_locus



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr1:197170611..197170660,+p1@CRB1
Hg19::chr7:63767783..63767861,+p2@ZNF736
Hg19::chr7:63767903..63767927,+p4@ZNF736


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0007163establishment and/or maintenance of cell polarity0.0236273009144786
GO:0016324apical plasma membrane0.0236273009144786
GO:0045177apical part of cell0.0236273009144786
GO:0050953sensory perception of light stimulus0.0367596844460144
GO:0007601visual perception0.0367596844460144



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
lymphocyte6.23e-0753
common lymphoid progenitor6.23e-0753
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
adult organism1.19e-39115
neural tube3.81e-3157
neural rod3.81e-3157
future spinal cord3.81e-3157
neural keel3.81e-3157
regional part of brain7.69e-2859
brain1.22e-2669
future brain1.22e-2669
central nervous system6.70e-2682
regional part of nervous system1.03e-2594
nervous system1.03e-2594
neurectoderm6.89e-2590
anterior neural tube1.84e-2442
regional part of forebrain3.30e-2441
forebrain3.30e-2441
future forebrain3.30e-2441
neural plate1.39e-2386
presumptive neural plate1.39e-2386
gray matter1.35e-1934
brain grey matter1.35e-1934
telencephalon1.59e-1934
regional part of telencephalon5.71e-1933
cerebral hemisphere3.35e-1832
pre-chordal neural plate5.43e-1861
anterior region of body1.59e-17129
craniocervical region1.59e-17129
head1.79e-15123
regional part of cerebral cortex6.04e-1422
ectoderm6.85e-14173
presumptive ectoderm6.85e-14173
cerebral cortex7.37e-1425
pallium7.37e-1425
ectoderm-derived structure6.86e-13169
neocortex1.16e-1220
posterior neural tube7.64e-0815
chordal neural plate7.64e-0815
nucleus of brain2.76e-079
neural nucleus2.76e-079
basal ganglion2.99e-079
nuclear complex of neuraxis2.99e-079
aggregate regional part of brain2.99e-079
collection of basal ganglia2.99e-079
cerebral subcortex2.99e-079


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.