Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2302

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:22, 21 May 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2302_CD133_CD34_acute_non_Eosinophils_Hodgkin_granulocyte



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr14:56683795..56683803,+p@chr14:56683795..56683803
+
Hg19::chr19:39826293..39826315,-p2@GMFG
Hg19::chr1:214614555..214614558,-p@chr1:214614555..214614558
-
Hg19::chr6:142702634..142702638,+p@chr6:142702634..142702638
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic stem cell1.19e-69172
angioblastic mesenchymal cell1.19e-69172
hematopoietic cell4.14e-64182
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell7.02e-64165
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell7.02e-64165
leukocyte9.61e-45140
myeloid cell2.27e-43112
common myeloid progenitor2.27e-43112
nongranular leukocyte8.57e-38119
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell2.39e-35124
myeloid leukocyte2.58e-2476
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte2.83e-2142
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell4.56e-1971
classical monocyte6.75e-1945
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell2.69e-1870
monopoietic cell2.81e-1863
monocyte2.81e-1863
monoblast2.81e-1863
promonocyte2.81e-1863
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor4.71e-1865
T cell9.01e-1825
pro-T cell9.01e-1825
mesenchymal cell2.61e-17358
lymphocyte3.47e-1753
common lymphoid progenitor3.47e-1753
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell8.63e-1752
connective tissue cell4.05e-16365
motile cell3.64e-13390
mature alpha-beta T cell4.40e-1318
alpha-beta T cell4.40e-1318
immature T cell4.40e-1318
mature T cell4.40e-1318
immature alpha-beta T cell4.40e-1318
stem cell3.25e-09444
multi fate stem cell4.72e-09430
somatic stem cell2.10e-08436
granulocyte2.21e-088
CD8-positive, alpha-beta T cell4.85e-0811
intermediate monocyte5.93e-089
CD14-positive, CD16-positive monocyte5.93e-089
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic system2.20e-26102
blood island2.20e-26102
hemolymphoid system2.55e-24112
bone marrow4.42e-1680
connective tissue9.25e-16375
bone element9.35e-1486
immune system2.22e-13115
skeletal element2.38e-09101
skeletal system2.38e-09101
blood4.58e-0815
haemolymphatic fluid4.58e-0815
organism substance4.58e-0815
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
hematologic cancer4.55e-3351
immune system cancer4.55e-3351
leukemia2.82e-3139
myeloid leukemia1.66e-2531
lymphoma4.81e-0710


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.